<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: T-Minus One Day: More Countdown to D and a 'Craplets!' Surprise for Walt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20070528/t-minus-one-day-more-countdown-to-d-and-a-craplets-surprise-for-walt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20070528/t-minus-one-day-more-countdown-to-d-and-a-craplets-surprise-for-walt/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:08:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Around the web &#124; alexking.org</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20070528/t-minus-one-day-more-countdown-to-d-and-a-craplets-surprise-for-walt/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Around the web &#124; alexking.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 19:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/20070528/t-minus-one-day-more-countdown-to-d-and-a-craplets-surprise-for-walt/#comment-149</guid>
		<description>[...] T-Minus One Day: More Countdown to D and a &#8216;Craplets!&#8217; Surprise for Walt &#124; Kara Swisher ... - I love that Kara blogged this. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] T-Minus One Day: More Countdown to D and a &#8216;Craplets!&#8217; Surprise for Walt | Kara Swisher &#8230; &#8211; I love that Kara blogged this. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Pytlovany</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20070528/t-minus-one-day-more-countdown-to-d-and-a-craplets-surprise-for-walt/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Pytlovany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 18:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/20070528/t-minus-one-day-more-countdown-to-d-and-a-craplets-surprise-for-walt/#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Thanks to Mike for pointing to my Blog. When I saw the referral it pointed me here and I&#039;m glad I found Kara&#039;s latest words of wisdom. I think I still have the AOL book in my office.

In fairness, Kara is correct. While others may have used the term craplet, Walt made it popular. 
(Thanks a lot Walt)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Mike for pointing to my Blog. When I saw the referral it pointed me here and I&#8217;m glad I found Kara&#8217;s latest words of wisdom. I think I still have the AOL book in my office.</p>
<p>In fairness, Kara is correct. While others may have used the term craplet, Walt made it popular.<br />
(Thanks a lot Walt)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Rowan</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20070528/t-minus-one-day-more-countdown-to-d-and-a-craplets-surprise-for-walt/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick Rowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 15:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/20070528/t-minus-one-day-more-countdown-to-d-and-a-craplets-surprise-for-walt/#comment-132</guid>
		<description>Wouldn’t it be great if coining or popularizing upbeat and constructive terms were as great sport as the negative ones? 

Until then, the ultimate way to keep unsolicited third-party products from getting the craplet label is to design the machine and its product parts to work better for users in the first place. (An immediate way is to use “helper” software such as ActiveWords to navigate through the complexity.) 

While start-from-scratch design would address the whole interface, integration, security, stability, and above all, ease-of-use, we all know that’s not going to happen anytime soon. Web-based products are not always &quot;better,&quot; but they are less likely to clog our computer registry and hard drive, and their development people can listen and respond with improvements quicker. They get my “Atta boy!”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn’t it be great if coining or popularizing upbeat and constructive terms were as great sport as the negative ones? </p>
<p>Until then, the ultimate way to keep unsolicited third-party products from getting the craplet label is to design the machine and its product parts to work better for users in the first place. (An immediate way is to use “helper” software such as ActiveWords to navigate through the complexity.) </p>
<p>While start-from-scratch design would address the whole interface, integration, security, stability, and above all, ease-of-use, we all know that’s not going to happen anytime soon. Web-based products are not always &#8220;better,&#8221; but they are less likely to clog our computer registry and hard drive, and their development people can listen and respond with improvements quicker. They get my “Atta boy!”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay Brooks</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20070528/t-minus-one-day-more-countdown-to-d-and-a-craplets-surprise-for-walt/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 13:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/20070528/t-minus-one-day-more-countdown-to-d-and-a-craplets-surprise-for-walt/#comment-131</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m  a 12  year user of  computers with a fair  understanding of it&#039;s parts and    programs drawn  here  by  Buzz&#039;s blog  post.  I  am  not  a geek  or involved in the industry. 

Buzz&#039;s ActiveWords  is a  tool  I  use dozens  of  times a  day  and,  in  my  opinion, ought to be  included with  every  OS  that  ships.  

In  my  12  years using computers  I  have often been frustrated by all  the  extras  that  come bundled  in that  installation CD. Often  I  have  no clue about  what it is or it&#039;s  value--the  icons  just  appear  on  the  desktop and it&#039;s my  job  to figure it  all  out.  All  of  these extras should  be  installed  optionally.  All  should have  legitimate  descriptions to  aid  the  consumer in deciding whether  to install now, later or  not. What  is  nice to have or necessary  is  entirely  dependent  upon  the consumer&#039;s  particular  situation  and  I do  resent  automatic  installation of  stuff I  never use,  that runs in  the  background  eating  up  resources and  has  no  uninstall  option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m  a 12  year user of  computers with a fair  understanding of it&#8217;s parts and    programs drawn  here  by  Buzz&#8217;s blog  post.  I  am  not  a geek  or involved in the industry. </p>
<p>Buzz&#8217;s ActiveWords  is a  tool  I  use dozens  of  times a  day  and,  in  my  opinion, ought to be  included with  every  OS  that  ships.  </p>
<p>In  my  12  years using computers  I  have often been frustrated by all  the  extras  that  come bundled  in that  installation CD. Often  I  have  no clue about  what it is or it&#8217;s  value&#8211;the  icons  just  appear  on  the  desktop and it&#8217;s my  job  to figure it  all  out.  All  of  these extras should  be  installed  optionally.  All  should have  legitimate  descriptions to  aid  the  consumer in deciding whether  to install now, later or  not. What  is  nice to have or necessary  is  entirely  dependent  upon  the consumer&#8217;s  particular  situation  and  I do  resent  automatic  installation of  stuff I  never use,  that runs in  the  background  eating  up  resources and  has  no  uninstall  option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Baker</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20070528/t-minus-one-day-more-countdown-to-d-and-a-craplets-surprise-for-walt/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 04:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/20070528/t-minus-one-day-more-countdown-to-d-and-a-craplets-surprise-for-walt/#comment-128</guid>
		<description>Jason,
Agree!  That&#039;s the way I recommend to clients prioritize features on new products:
A=must have
B=important to have
C=nice to have
Phil
www.philipgbaker.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason,<br />
Agree!  That&#8217;s the way I recommend to clients prioritize features on new products:<br />
A=must have<br />
B=important to have<br />
C=nice to have<br />
Phil<br />
<a href="http://www.philipgbaker.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.philipgbaker.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Womack</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20070528/t-minus-one-day-more-countdown-to-d-and-a-craplets-surprise-for-walt/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Womack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 03:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/20070528/t-minus-one-day-more-countdown-to-d-and-a-craplets-surprise-for-walt/#comment-126</guid>
		<description>Phil,

You bring up a great point. On my chosen path work, workplace performance and productivity, you bring up something I write about and speak about any chance I get:

What is necessary?
What is nice?
What is extra?
What gets in the way?


So, applied to a new computer, you can imagine how confusing the answers to these questions can be. Hopefully, you can see - too - how applying these questions to a manager&#039;s workspace could manifest in some great discussion...what do they keep? What do they remove?

Thanks for continuing the discussion...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil,</p>
<p>You bring up a great point. On my chosen path work, workplace performance and productivity, you bring up something I write about and speak about any chance I get:</p>
<p>What is necessary?<br />
What is nice?<br />
What is extra?<br />
What gets in the way?</p>
<p>So, applied to a new computer, you can imagine how confusing the answers to these questions can be. Hopefully, you can see &#8211; too &#8211; how applying these questions to a manager&#8217;s workspace could manifest in some great discussion&#8230;what do they keep? What do they remove?</p>
<p>Thanks for continuing the discussion&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Baker</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20070528/t-minus-one-day-more-countdown-to-d-and-a-craplets-surprise-for-walt/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 01:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/20070528/t-minus-one-day-more-countdown-to-d-and-a-craplets-surprise-for-walt/#comment-125</guid>
		<description>I agree with Buzz. It&#039;s less about the inclusion of this software and more about how difficult it is to remove it.

Most users can&#039;t differentiate between what&#039;s promotional and what&#039;s needed to make their computers run. It&#039;s sort of like imbedding ads within a newspaper story.

Computer companies can have it both ways. Provide a menu of the available free software with explanations and terms, and let the user select install or delete. 

I wouldn&#039;t call Quicken or Quickbooks a craplet. How about a new name like Samplet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Buzz. It&#8217;s less about the inclusion of this software and more about how difficult it is to remove it.</p>
<p>Most users can&#8217;t differentiate between what&#8217;s promotional and what&#8217;s needed to make their computers run. It&#8217;s sort of like imbedding ads within a newspaper story.</p>
<p>Computer companies can have it both ways. Provide a menu of the available free software with explanations and terms, and let the user select install or delete. </p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t call Quicken or Quickbooks a craplet. How about a new name like Samplet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Evangelist</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20070528/t-minus-one-day-more-countdown-to-d-and-a-craplets-surprise-for-walt/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Evangelist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 01:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/20070528/t-minus-one-day-more-countdown-to-d-and-a-craplets-surprise-for-walt/#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Sorry Kara (and Walt) but the term &#039;craplet&#039; was in use long before Walt&#039;s article. Here&#039;s just one example:
http://billpstudios.blogspot.com/2007/01/worlds-best-craplet-cleaner.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Kara (and Walt) but the term &#8216;craplet&#8217; was in use long before Walt&#8217;s article. Here&#8217;s just one example:<br />
<a href="http://billpstudios.blogspot.com/2007/01/worlds-best-craplet-cleaner.html" rel="nofollow">http://billpstudios.blogspot.c.....eaner.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buzz Bruggeman</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20070528/t-minus-one-day-more-countdown-to-d-and-a-craplets-surprise-for-walt/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Buzz Bruggeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 00:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/20070528/t-minus-one-day-more-countdown-to-d-and-a-craplets-surprise-for-walt/#comment-123</guid>
		<description>If you are a little company, and if you have built a very good product, with lots of very happy users, you are then faced with two fairly daunting problems,e.g. distribution and adoption of your product. 

If you are fortunate enough to talk an OEM into bundling your product with theirs, why is there a presumtion that your product is a &quot;craplet&quot;. 

How would you suggest that one avoid this unfortunate label?

Just curious...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are a little company, and if you have built a very good product, with lots of very happy users, you are then faced with two fairly daunting problems,e.g. distribution and adoption of your product. </p>
<p>If you are fortunate enough to talk an OEM into bundling your product with theirs, why is there a presumtion that your product is a &#8220;craplet&#8221;. </p>
<p>How would you suggest that one avoid this unfortunate label?</p>
<p>Just curious&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>