How High Can You Count: New Facebook Fundraising?

Here’s an interesting idea if you don’t want to get bought and you can’t quite IPO yet and you need to have a tidy war chest for expansion or perhaps a choice acquisition or two: Bring in more investors and raise more money at a huge valuation.

That’s a concept that the top dogs at Facebook are seriously mulling over now, according to sources, after getting so many inquiries from investment funds and several bigger companies–such as its ad-serving partner, Microsoft–about grabbing a stake in the fast-growing social-networking Web site.
While who and how much is still unclear and, most importantly, in what form, sources said a deal could come together quickly if the numbers are lofty enough for the site, which has about 40 million members currently. But the investment could be quite large, well beyond its last $25 million one in 2006, for little dilution.
“There are several B’s involved in the discussions,” said one person interested in the possible round, referring to a multibillion valuation for the Palo Alto, Calif.-based start-up.
Those kinds of valuations have already been bandied about for the site, from a just-under-$1-billion deal from Yahoo that fell apart last year and rumors of a $6 billion interest from Microsoft.

And in a widely read interview with the Deal in July, board member and early investor Peter Thiel (pictured here) of the Founders Fund floated a more massive figure.
“If we got an offer from someone for $10 billion, we probably would listen to them,” Thiel told the Deal’s David Shabelman. “I don’t think we’re going to get that offer, and we’re not going to solicit it.”
Thiel initially invested $500,000 in 2004 in the company, which was followed by two more rounds, for a total of about $32 million. The last one was more than a year ago for $25 million, giving Facebook a $525 million pre-money valuation.
Other major investors include Accel Partners (Accel’s Jim Breyer is also on the board, along with Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg) and Greylock Partners, as well as Meritech Capital Partners.
In the Deal interview, Thiel also said that Facebook would not go public until its business was stronger and not until at least 2009, following the successful tactics once employed by a pre-IPO Google.
But that’s a lot of time for the company, which needs to keep growing at a rapid pace, both from a technology and innovation point of view.
While it is on track, Thiel and Breyer have both said publicly, to have revenues of $150 million this year, half of that comes from its guaranteed ad deal with Microsoft.
While its revenues are growing strongly, insiders report, so are its costs, as it ratchets up headcount and features and services.
Thus, it will need a lot of investment to keep competitive, including increasing its international profile.
For example, top Facebook execs are now in London, meeting with the British press and also announcing the opening of a spanking new office there. London is Facebook’s largest member city, in terms of geography, and Britain is its third biggest country, after the U.S. and Canada.
In addition, Facebook might need a pile of moolah to buy smaller companies to help build its business, such as its very first acquisition in July of Parakey (mostly for its star techie duo, Blake Ross and Joe Hewitt, co-founders of Mozilla Firefox).
But in order to do more acquisitions, Facebook might want a larger established valuation for its stock and also cash to use.
“If Facebook can do this without significant dilution, it’s a great deal for the venture investors,” said one person familiar with Facebook. “And it could give Facebook a lot of flexibility.”
But who gets to invest is another story, especially given that the company is the latest hot ticket since Google in Silicon Valley. An obvious candidate is Microsoft.
But some close to Facebook worry that aligning itself so closely with the software giant is a mistake, believing that it should not be too closely linked to any one company.
In any case, given the heat surrounding the company, there is no lack of moneybag suitors, all waiting to rain down copious cash on Zuckerberg and his team.
Follow Kara on Twitter | Follow AllThingsD on Twitter




Comments
i am totally agree with you, next news about facebook will be another venture funding not an IPO.Also, thanks for telling that so many people have already invested into facebook.Its, a long list.
must say awesome writing will check soon for more.
Posted by chandan kumar at September 11th, 2007 at 6:32 amKara,
First of all, IMHO Facebook will be worth $100 billion by Dec. 2008 when they have 200+ million users and they will be valued by the public market at $500 per user based on their multiple sources of revenue. You can read my “Triumph of the Nerds — Part Deux” post at http://blog.adonomics.com for the detailed discussion as to why.
However, I do believe it would make sense for Facebook to salt away $500 million or so worth of a war chest at a valuation of around $10 billion. Microsoft would be the logical investor and should ask for the following key deal points:
1. An agreement that Facebook not to sell to Google or allow Google to invest.
2. An agreement that extends Microsoft’s existing CPM ad deal for a 10 or 20 year period.
3. An agreement that broadends Microsoft’s existing CPM ad deal into the Keyword-Driven CPC ad space that would be part of a Web Search business that Facebook could enter at any moment they choose to by simply supporting a web search option / results as part of their current People/Group/App search box.
Microsoft has a HUGE opportunity to beat Google in Advertising by playing their facebook cards carefully. Steve Ballmer made the right first move by locking up a CPM ad deal through 2011. However, it is critical that Microsoft support Facebook in Facebook’s coming battle with Google. This means providing funds to ensure smooth scaling of their infrastructure and headcount. In addition, Microsoft should be willing to buy shares from any VC’s or others who might be desirous of an early cashout.
In addition to cash, the HUGE play for Microsoft is to obtain an option for a larger stake of Facebook tied to Microsoft pushing 30 to 50 million of their 600+ million app customers into becoming facebook members. Microsoft should do this now since a large number will ultimately do it later anyway (so it is essentially a wasting asset for Microsoft). The methodology would be to leverage facebook membership and groups as the best way to get support on Microsoft products and to have Microsoft developers create killer versions / extensions of their desktop apps that have natural groupware components (e.g., Outlook’s calender, Microsoft project, etc.)
This would accelerate Facebook’s already building momentum in the over 25 crowd, bring in more business users who advertisers will pay more to reach and be invaluable in stopping an attempts by Google to establish a beachhead in the social operating system domain.
Google makes money pushing anonymous people off their web properties whereas Facebook makes money keeping people with real identities inside their web properties. This fundamental difference means that Facebook’s Social Operating System and Application play is ultimately worth more than Google’s search and advertising play. Microsoft realizes this and the trick is to ensure that Facebook succeeds and to invest Microsoft’s resources (money, users, office suite, browser clout, etc.) in a way that gives Microsoft a big share of the facebook cash flow without necessarily owning the company (which would probably demotivate the facebook employees and some users).
It will be a test of Bill and Steve’s poker playing skills to see if they can let another Harvard drop-out at the table take on the chip leader. My bet is that Bill and Steve are happy to have Mark be in the limelight so long as Microsoft shareholders benefit.
Thanks,
Posted by Lee Lorenzen at September 14th, 2007 at 10:06 amLee Lorenzen
CEO, Altura Ventures — the First Facebook-Only VC Firm
This can help the fund raisers on Facebook Fundraising Tips.
http://www.FacebookFundraisingTips.com
Posted by jr aserios at September 30th, 2008 at 6:29 pm