<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Max Levchin on Slide's $500 Million Valuation and Other Widgety Issues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080205/max-levchin-on-slides-500-million-valuation-and-other-widgety-issues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080205/max-levchin-on-slides-500-million-valuation-and-other-widgety-issues/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:34:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dave mcclure</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080205/max-levchin-on-slides-500-million-valuation-and-other-widgety-issues/#comment-2803</link>
		<dc:creator>dave mcclure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080205/max-levchin-on-slides-500-million-valuation-and-other-widgety-issues/#comment-2803</guid>
		<description>@rod sandcones: huh?  wtf r u talking about?

Slide is nothing BUT distribution.   150M users, hundreds of millions of widgets, billions of page views... excuse me mr. pipe dream, but just what kind of Wal-Mart distribution are you thinking of?

max may have some plenty big shoes to fill on valuation / monetization, but he most certainly has demonstrated distribution on both Facebook, MySpace, and the IntarWeb.

i think the bigger challenge is showing they can provide transactional value and/or targeting behavior that indicate 
large revenue potential.

i agree with Kara: max is competitive / aggressive as hell, but he ain&#039;t stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@rod sandcones: huh?  wtf r u talking about?</p>
<p>Slide is nothing BUT distribution.   150M users, hundreds of millions of widgets, billions of page views&#8230; excuse me mr. pipe dream, but just what kind of Wal-Mart distribution are you thinking of?</p>
<p>max may have some plenty big shoes to fill on valuation / monetization, but he most certainly has demonstrated distribution on both Facebook, MySpace, and the IntarWeb.</p>
<p>i think the bigger challenge is showing they can provide transactional value and/or targeting behavior that indicate<br />
large revenue potential.</p>
<p>i agree with Kara: max is competitive / aggressive as hell, but he ain&#8217;t stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rod sandcones</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080205/max-levchin-on-slides-500-million-valuation-and-other-widgety-issues/#comment-2801</link>
		<dc:creator>rod sandcones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080205/max-levchin-on-slides-500-million-valuation-and-other-widgety-issues/#comment-2801</guid>
		<description>The problem with most of these pipe dreams is distribution.  You might have the greatest product in the world, but without the distribution channels to &quot;get it out there&quot;, you have nothing.  These insane valuations are becoming more emblematic of the times.  Line up a distribution deal with Wal-Mart or someone similar, then I might start believing your hype.  Internet Distribution is not a real solution, imho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with most of these pipe dreams is distribution.  You might have the greatest product in the world, but without the distribution channels to &#8220;get it out there&#8221;, you have nothing.  These insane valuations are becoming more emblematic of the times.  Line up a distribution deal with Wal-Mart or someone similar, then I might start believing your hype.  Internet Distribution is not a real solution, imho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
