<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: While Ballmer and Yang Fiddle, Web 2.0 Hotties Burn&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080425/while-ballmer-and-yang-fiddle-web-20-hotties-burn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080425/while-ballmer-and-yang-fiddle-web-20-hotties-burn/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:57:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kara Swisher</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080425/while-ballmer-and-yang-fiddle-web-20-hotties-burn/#comment-3083</link>
		<dc:creator>Kara Swisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 03:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080425/while-ballmer-and-yang-fiddle-web-20-hotties-burn/#comment-3083</guid>
		<description>Pete:

I criticized that report you refer to in your comment that appeared a while back on TechCrunch, because it was incorrect. As TechCrunch asserted, Google and Microsoft were not in some elaborate bidding war for the company at an incredible price and about to be sold. I think they tried to get the story right and their sources were wrong and Digg CEO Jay Adelson himself said it was untrue.

Just because someone says a company is in play, even if it might be interested in selling, and then gets all the details and circumstances and facts wrong at the time, does not make the report correct in the first place. 

And, even when I criticized the story, I did note either Google or MSFT were good acquirer candidates for Digg, and have said that several times in posts about it and several other Web companies. But that was clearly written as opinion and not based on reporting.

I have been following the story since as I did think Digg was a likely acquisition candidate at some point in its life and via good sources, and now I believe the talks with Google to be genuine and more serious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete:</p>
<p>I criticized that report you refer to in your comment that appeared a while back on TechCrunch, because it was incorrect. As TechCrunch asserted, Google and Microsoft were not in some elaborate bidding war for the company at an incredible price and about to be sold. I think they tried to get the story right and their sources were wrong and Digg CEO Jay Adelson himself said it was untrue.</p>
<p>Just because someone says a company is in play, even if it might be interested in selling, and then gets all the details and circumstances and facts wrong at the time, does not make the report correct in the first place. </p>
<p>And, even when I criticized the story, I did note either Google or MSFT were good acquirer candidates for Digg, and have said that several times in posts about it and several other Web companies. But that was clearly written as opinion and not based on reporting.</p>
<p>I have been following the story since as I did think Digg was a likely acquisition candidate at some point in its life and via good sources, and now I believe the talks with Google to be genuine and more serious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac Beach</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080425/while-ballmer-and-yang-fiddle-web-20-hotties-burn/#comment-3081</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac Beach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080425/while-ballmer-and-yang-fiddle-web-20-hotties-burn/#comment-3081</guid>
		<description>I can hardly wait for the case of indi-GEST-ion that MS will get from swallowing Yahoo, but the results would/will be the same if they swallowed the companies you name.

Microsoft is like a very large python snake.  Yahoo is like a Sears Kenmore deluxe washer dryer combo.

The companies you name are like that washer-dryer taken apart down to the major component level.

The issue isn&#039;t the size of the things swallowed, its what they are made of.  In the case of the Kenmore, mostly steel.  In the case of Yahoo and those smaller companies, mostly Unix.

Either way, MS (the python) will choke if not die.

This has been Mac Beach, reporting from the museum of bad analogies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can hardly wait for the case of indi-GEST-ion that MS will get from swallowing Yahoo, but the results would/will be the same if they swallowed the companies you name.</p>
<p>Microsoft is like a very large python snake.  Yahoo is like a Sears Kenmore deluxe washer dryer combo.</p>
<p>The companies you name are like that washer-dryer taken apart down to the major component level.</p>
<p>The issue isn&#8217;t the size of the things swallowed, its what they are made of.  In the case of the Kenmore, mostly steel.  In the case of Yahoo and those smaller companies, mostly Unix.</p>
<p>Either way, MS (the python) will choke if not die.</p>
<p>This has been Mac Beach, reporting from the museum of bad analogies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Spande</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080425/while-ballmer-and-yang-fiddle-web-20-hotties-burn/#comment-3080</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Spande</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080425/while-ballmer-and-yang-fiddle-web-20-hotties-burn/#comment-3080</guid>
		<description>Why is it OK for you to spread an acquisition rumor but you criticize TechCrunch for doing same?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it OK for you to spread an acquisition rumor but you criticize TechCrunch for doing same?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kara Swisher</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080425/while-ballmer-and-yang-fiddle-web-20-hotties-burn/#comment-3079</link>
		<dc:creator>Kara Swisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080425/while-ballmer-and-yang-fiddle-web-20-hotties-burn/#comment-3079</guid>
		<description>D:

It will be and soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D:</p>
<p>It will be and soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technology Watcher</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080425/while-ballmer-and-yang-fiddle-web-20-hotties-burn/#comment-3078</link>
		<dc:creator>Technology Watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080425/while-ballmer-and-yang-fiddle-web-20-hotties-burn/#comment-3078</guid>
		<description>Interesting points on the other web 2.0 hotties - specially Digg. I am surprised it hasn&#039;t been lapped up already. 
-D
http://techwatch.reviewk.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting points on the other web 2.0 hotties &#8211; specially Digg. I am surprised it hasn&#8217;t been lapped up already.<br />
-D<br />
<a href="http://techwatch.reviewk.com/" rel="nofollow">http://techwatch.reviewk.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
