All Things Digital

Skip to main content.

The Sweet, Sweet Irony of Mark Cuban and Yahoo

Of the amazingly Internet-experience-free board that billionaire investor Carl Icahn has proposed to replace Yahoo’s current directors in this proxy fight, there is one name who does have a lot of Web-related experience, especially with regards to Yahoo (YHOO).

Specifically, in how to make bank from Yahoo’s desperation.

markcuban

That would be entrepreneur and all-around bon vivant Mark Cuban (he is pictured here at our first D: All Things Digital conference in 2003), who sold Broadcast.com to Yahoo in the heady days of 1999 for $5.7 billion in Yahoo stock.

It was a huge deal at the time, with Yahoo engaged in an arms war with other Internet companies like Excite (remember them?), AOL (TWX) and others.

In an acquisitions frenzy, it grabbed Broadcast.com, which was started in 1992 as AudioNet, with Cuban and others in charge.

Broadcast.com was one of the nascent efforts to broadcast online, focusing on radio-like content on the Web, largely using sports and other live events.

It had one of those typical Web 1.0 faux-blockbuster IPOs in 1998 and then, as the stock began to decline, sold quickly to Yahoo a year later.

Right before, as it turned out, the whole bubble burst.

But Cuban and his cohorts made their scratch and were soon gone from Yahoo.

Cuban, sensing the end was nigh, also dumped his Yahoo shares before the decline. And, armed with a fortune, he began his fun foray into a range of businesses, from sports teams to movie theaters to his HDNet, a high-definition cable network.

cubandairyqueen

And, of course, the private jets and entertaining courtside antics and working at the Dairy Queen!

And, also of course, most of Broadcast.com’s assets are useless to Yahoo today.

Now, Cuban is back knocking at Yahoo’s door as an invader, the only major Internet figure apparently willing to turn on the iconic Yahoo CEO and Co-Founder Jerry Yang.

Calling Benedict Arnold!

I don’t blame Cuban, actually, although Yang surely will be angry over his presence on the Icahn board.

There was always a level of rancor within Yahoo about Cuban, because he sold Broadcast.com at the top, traded out of Yahoo shares at the top and then simply sat back and watched it all as a billionaire gadfly.

BoomTown used to even tease Yang about how Cuban was richer than he was and got to have all the fun. It would always get a glare out of him.

So too could Cuban, as in this post from his smart Blog Maverick (of course, it is named that!) blog, right after Microsoft’s (MSFT) unsolicited bid for Yahoo,.

In it, Cuban urged Yang to sell to the Internet giant, largely due to the pressure of competing with Google (GOOG).

Cuban wrote:

Building a world class Yahoo to be the best company it possibly can be using the management skills that Jerry and company have is a far different challenge than optimizing the stock price. Particularly when Google is your stock comp…

Which is exactly why Jerry and David should sell to MSFT…

So the question isn’t whether Yahoo should sell. It should. The only question is what the structure of the deal should look like so that Jerry and David can achieve many of the goals they set out to accomplish on the net under the MSFT umbrella. Jerry definitely is about customers first. This is his chance to show it…

So Yahoo should say yes. It’s less about the money than about finally achieving the corporate goals set out more than a decade ago. One time Jerry told me that Yahoo stood for You Always Have Other Options. This time Yahoo doesn’t, but their customers options could improve exponentially if Yahoo says yes.”

Given the Yahoo acquisition of Broadcast.com gave the clever Cuban the billions he has used so entertainingly, it’s all kind of ironic, no?

Comments

  1. I remember shortly after Mark Cuban sold Broadcast.com to Yahoo!, the Wall Street Journal wrote this terrific, and highly embarrassing to Yahoo!, article describing how Cuban sold Broadcast.com, and quickly started shorting Yahoo! stock. I can’t seem to find that article on WSJ.com, but it is a great read.

    Posted by John Lin at May 15th, 2008 at 4:22 pm
  2. So, Mark Cuban is one of Icahn’s guys. What a team. I am in favor of a sale to Microsoft but not headed up by people like Cuban. this guy stuck it lucky rich one time and now is an internet expert?

    Posted by Allen Anderson at May 15th, 2008 at 6:06 pm
  3. Allen,
    Lets Face it ..Cuban is Smart. Broadcast.com is not his only success . he has created and sold two more venture and he has invested in many good startups .REad his blog once to know what you are talking about .

    Now back to the original theme of this post : Should he be there on board .I think He shouldn’t . But My thinking ( or yours ,for that matter ) is not imp here. this is an issue of once judgment ,He might be having his own reasons .we are no one to define morality /ethics for Cuban . This is a free world .

    Posted by Prashant Singh at May 15th, 2008 at 8:47 pm
  4. To Prashant’s point, Cuban did start and sell a company prior to Broadcast.com netting him millions.

    Was Cuban more lucky than smart with Broadcast.com? Maybe - but there were plenty of those types of people during the dot com bubble.

    Cuban gets a lot of flack because he has a big mouth, but I would tend to agree that he’s not a dummy. Whether or not Cuban should be on the Yahoo! board, that is another question.

    Posted by John Lin at May 16th, 2008 at 10:00 am
  5. Genius move on part of Icahn, seriously. Not only does Cuban bring the acumen to actually contribute, but he plays like Icahn, he is obsessive in the same way. Not sure who has a bigger ego, but I guarantee you that Cuban would *love* to have his name associated with the team that flushed the Yahoo BOD, but moreso one of the guys that made all the shareholders profit.

    Marc Andreessen wrote a fantastic blog about how this whole deal would go down, detail blow by blow. http://blog.pmarca.com/2008/04.....ft-go.html

    After reading this, I did some research on how many F500 companies have a staggered BOD…not Yahoo though. As KS says…at least they get to write all lower case and keep their !

    So, Jerry:

    1. Turns down two offers at a significant premium to shareholders.
    2. Misses out on an opportunity to innovate and really go head to head with Googe without having to make Wallstreet happy every quarter.
    3. Doesn’t have a plan B
    4. Doesn’t and didn’t have better offers (or any offers for that matter) to justify turning MSFT down twice!
    5. Continues to make sensless acquisitions and play golf while everyone is wondering what is wrong…or what is right that he isn’t telling us.

    It’s gotta suck to get fired from the company you started.

    Posted by Robert Hancock at May 17th, 2008 at 9:19 pm

Add a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment. Sign up here or log in below.

About Kara

Kara Swisher started covering digital issues for The Wall Street Journal's San Francisco bureau in 1997 and also wrote the BoomTown column about the sector. With Walt Mossberg, she co-produces and co-hosts D: All Things Digital, a major high-tech and media conference.

Read more »

Ethics Statement

Here is a statement of my ethics and coverage policies. It is more than most of you want to know, but, in the age of suspicion of the media, I am laying it all out.

Read more »