All Things Digital

Skip to main content.

BoomTown

An Interview With Yahoo’s Jerry Yang, Part 1: The Econalypse’s Impact and More

BoomTown was a squeaky enough wheel to get Yahoo CEO Jerry Yang to grant a long interview by phone yesterday–just a day after he had announced weak third-quarter earnings results for the Internet giant, caught as others are in the econalypse, as well as layoffs of at least 10 percent of its global workforce.

But instead of being glum, as you might expect, especially after a year of corporate turmoil that would have finally gotten to even Job–let’s review: management upheaval, a Microsoft (MSFT) takeover battle, an attack by billionaire activist Carl Icahn, tangling with the Justice Department over a pending Google (GOOG) search advertising partnership and more!–Yang sounded surprisingly confident that Yahoo (YHOO) would emerge a winner after all the wrenching change is wrought at the company he co-founded.

I split the interview into two parts. The second will appear later today at 4 p.m. Pacific time, talking about Icahn, the Google deal, Microsoft and why Yang thinks he is the right leader for Yahoo, so check back.

Here is the first part, in which he talks about Yahoo’s financial performance and the impact of the bad economy on Yahoo’s dominant display advertising business and gives more details of the layoffs and cost cuts.

BT: How do you look at the last quarter?:

Yang: What we said was that the quarter showed some strength in U.S. search and performance display, but more weakness in branded, especially at the end in the U.S., and more so internationally. The U.S. started softening in Q2 and that continued into Q3. International was hit much harder, although display still grew double-digits there in Q3. Softness started in the U.K. early, and we knew when the French came back from vacation in September and did not buy ads at the same levels that those were trends we had to watch.

Asia was more of a surprise, but the same trends were happening there too. Because we have such a big market share there, we are looking to every country for what is coming next.

BT: And what is your Q4 outlook?:

Yang: Like everyone else, we are pretty much forced to formulate our views in an unprecedented set of circumstances because things are changing so quickly and the world looks a lot different than just three or four weeks ago.

There has been some stability, and some business is being done still, but we don’t know how bad it is going to get, and neither does anyone.

Generally, of the spending that is done in the display advertising market online, we get our share.

It is a little like 2001, when online usage continued to go up, but revenue drivers declined. And, even in times like this, the Internet continues to show more engagement.

Obviously, no one knows when the market is going to bottom out, and I am certainly not an economist. You can talk yourself into a loop, but no one really knows where it is going yet.

But when it does turn, people are going to ask where the audience is, and we have to be able to move fast when it turns.

We also said that when advertisers are spending, they are spending with us, which is a good sign. Right now, we don’t hear we are losing deals to social sites, for example.

Of course, I can’t imagine advertisers are going to say we’re going to juice up spending soon, and so we’re assuming a lengthy period of weakness. I don’t think anyone is going to be immune, even though search performance ads are probably more able to withstand a downturn in spending. What was good for us was that our search and our performance display businesses were both up in the quarter.

BT: Any more details about the layoffs and other cuts?:

Yang: We want to do it before the holidays, which is why we wanted to let people know that it would affect 10 percent [of Yahoo's work force]. But we also want to make sure that we are cutting to be more effective and not cutting for cutting’s sake.

We have been growing costs for the last few years while we were investing in new products and platforms, and we have also made a lot of acquisitions and additions. There have been redundancies and geo-consolidation that we had not addressed that we are doing now. I know that sounds generic, but doing this is really important.

I look at these cuts as both a short-term and long-term effort. In the short term, we have consolidation and organizational corrections to make. In the long term, we will look at our whole portfolio and are now asking ourselves in each case if we need to be in this business.

We’re asking ourselves–should we sell it or should we shut it down? That is the kind of comprehensive look we are doing across the company.

Comments

  1. Yahoo recently ranked as the #2 online property behind Google with 25% of us consumers willing to pay for it. Why is Yahoo so underperforming when smaller companies or larger companies in the same league are holding their own? (see http://tinyurl.com/6lfww3) for source of statistic.

    Posted by nilofer merchant at October 23rd, 2008 at 12:19 pm
  2. I have visited Yahoo many times and about 50% of its workforce could be let go and the business wouldn’t even notice it

    The 12 people to 1 light bulb phenom exists at Yahoo

    Posted by Sam Harrison at October 23rd, 2008 at 1:29 pm
  3. N:

    Well, that is an excellent question.

    Posted by Kara Swisher at October 23rd, 2008 at 2:17 pm
  4. The problem is that Jerry, Sue and/or Roy don’t seem to be part of the 10% that is getting fired. They represent the single most incompetent management team in history, and that is saying a lot after Enron, Tyco, Global, etc.. Arrogance and self-entitlement loom large on Yahoo’s Board and unfortunately Carl hasn’t done much yet. My hope is that Carl is keeping quiet while he is designing his plan of attack, but Yang can’t get booted fast enough for me.

    Posted by Mike Kane at October 23rd, 2008 at 3:22 pm
  5. Why don’t you add a little more to the fear mongering with your title? Oh wait, you already did.

    Posted by andrew textor at October 23rd, 2008 at 4:51 pm
  6. it would have been cool if you’d posted all his answers without using any capitalization.

    Posted by Thomas Hawk at October 23rd, 2008 at 8:04 pm
  7. S:

    How many Yahoos does it take to screw in a lightbulb?

    Posted by Kara Swisher at October 23rd, 2008 at 10:58 pm
  8. M:

    Than Enron? There are no gold-plated bathroom fixtures at Yahoo.

    Posted by Kara Swisher at October 23rd, 2008 at 10:58 pm
  9. A:

    Why don’t you just smile at the cute word mashup?

    Posted by Kara Swisher at October 23rd, 2008 at 10:59 pm
  10. T:

    I am unable to badly punctuate!

    Posted by Kara Swisher at October 23rd, 2008 at 11:00 pm

Add a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment. Sign up here or log in below.

Comments posted on this site must be signed with your full, real name. Please see our Comments policy for details.

Latest BoomTown Videos

More Videos »

About Kara

Kara Swisher started covering digital issues for The Wall Street Journal's San Francisco bureau in 1997 and also wrote the BoomTown column about the sector. With Walt Mossberg, she co-produces and co-hosts D: All Things Digital, a major high-tech and media conference. Read more »

Ethics Statement

Here is a statement of my ethics and coverage policies. It is more than most of you want to know, but, in the age of suspicion of the media, I am laying it all out.

Read more »