All Things Digital

Skip to main content.

BoomTown

Lloyd Braun’s Not Going to Take It Anymore: “I Am Not an Umbrella Thief” (and He’s Not, Actually)

There it was again–like the gnarly ghost of Christmas past–in the Los Angeles Times this week. But this time Lloyd Braun wasn’t going to take it anymore.

The object of his ire was dropped right in the middle of a blog post on how Yahoo was “reversing its Hollywoodification” with–egads–no more reserved parking spaces for top execs at its Santa Monica offices.

The Times said the new rule “signals a stark new era of austerity that overshadows the elimination of the last vestiges of the corporate culture war spurred by the hiring of former Warner Bros. chieftain Terry Semel and ABC’s Braun.”

Knock, knock, L.A. Times! Because that war is actually still raging at Yahoo (YHOO)–although the parking spaces carry little symbolic weight anymore at the company, which has much bigger problems to solve these days.

But even more unusually, the piece also abruptly dropped in old allegations the newspaper had included in a devastating story in November of 2005 by Chris Gaither about Braun and Yahoo’s media push at the time, titled “Can Yahoo Sign on to Hollywood?”

It was noted in the post as an aside:

(Braun also converted a conference room with a patio into his personal office and requested a corporate jet for the Santa Monica office. Oh, and there was the time he reportedly took an umbrella without paying for it from the Yahoo store on a rainy day and then asked the clerk who requested payment: ‘Do you know who I am?’ He later explained that he just wanted to make sure the clerk knew he was good for it. But we digress).”

Digress is right, because it turns out, the bulk of those juicy anecdotes about him in the new blog post and the old story actually don’t check out, after extensive reporting BoomTown had done previously and this week too, talking to a range of key execs at the company at the time.

Thus, when I saw the Times post this week, I contacted Braun (pictured here) and sent him the link. He quickly responded via email:

“I am not an umbrella thief–and I promise I never will be. I never once asked for a corporate jet. I was and continue to be a big fan of Southwest Airlines. And I certainly never engaged in any kind of office construction while at Yahoo.”

Braun–who now runs his own online and traditional media production company called BermanBraun in L.A. with Gail Berman–also said he had immediately asked the Times for a correction of the blog post, as he says he did three years ago when the original story ran.

Times Business editor Sallie Hofmeister, whom I also contacted (but who was not in charge at the time of the 2005 piece), said the Times was looking into the situation and wrote in an email to me:

“The story we published in 2005 was a reflection of the sentiments within Yahoo at the time. We worked very closely with Yahoo on the story, so the company’s top management had every opportunity to challenge our reporting. After the story ran three years ago, neither Yahoo nor Lloyd requested a correction and no correction ran. What you hear from people today probably would be different than what they would have said three years ago. Lloyd is long gone and so are the tensions of entertainment’s invasion at Yahoo. People’s recollections also change. Enemies then are friends today.

“As for blog post, we strive for accuracy and when people in our stories take issue with our coverage, we take them very seriously.”

So do I.

Thus, it is long past time to set the record straight and put to bed a fable of raging Hollywood high-handedness–with too-good-to-be-true-because-they’re-not, clichéd lines like, “Do you know who I am?” and filched umbrellas.

Why bother looking into it at all these years hence? Well, for one, it is just not fair for inaccuracies about Braun to remain, complete with a never-die life on the Web and a nagging perception that he was some digital version of Ari Gold from “Entourage.”

But, more importantly, the struggles at Yahoo back then have everything to do with what is going on now. And that is a company culture at war with itself about what it is and should be.

I have, in fact, been collecting string on Braun’s alleged escapades for years, mostly from Yahoos. I was fascinated since, like a game of telephone gone awry, those who worked with Braun closely and would know, told a different story from some of those in Sunnyvale, who might not.

That did not stop many there from telling various stories about Braun, almost none of which were accurate when I actually followed up.

Because of that, I started to look very closely at Yahoo to figure out why such fallacies went unchecked about him and later, about an ever longer string of departed execs.

But let’s start with what was clearly true in that 2005 piece, which began with another parking kerfuffle and a hissy-fit email from a new Yahoo exec, recruited from Fox, threatening to tow “someone” who parked in his assigned place.

It was a classic opening, trying to show in an anecdote the clash that was going on at Yahoo at the time.

And it was an apt one. There was indeed a lot of resistance to the decision by then-CEO Terry Semel, who was pushing Yahoo as a media company.

To do it, Semel hired Braun–a highly successful Hollywood figure (think being key to initiating and developing “Lost,” “Desperate Housewives” and “Grey’s Anatomy,” and you have a good idea of his stature)–to pull it off at a big new and splashy office complex in Santa Monica.

Thus, the lines were drawn by some at Yahoo HQ, where execs mostly work in cubicles and where a we’re-all-equal ethos prevailed among some of the techie old guard especially, at least in their skewed perceptions of themselves.

(Guess what? They do work in cubicles, but some Yahoos in Sunnyvale are more equal than others.)

Still, back in 2005, it was easy to make an ebullient, brash and sometimes abrasive entertainment exec like Braun into a tidy little caricature and mock the idea of his task.

And who was hired to make new and innovative kinds of online programming hits, much as Braun had on television so well.

There is no doubt there were tensions. The Times story began focusing on the level of distrust, which in my estimation–I also was watching Yahoo closely at the time–was mostly from the tech side and mostly without interface with those in Los Angeles.

But, as Gaither noted correctly:

Yahoo’s ability to blend the cultures, milking each for what it does best, will be key to reaching its ultimate goal: to build on its success as the most visited destination on the Web by leveraging the links between content and the technology used to create and deliver it.”

Unfortunately, the Times story then launched into a series of really broad clichés about Hollywood versus Silicon Valley, using the typical “conspicuously expensive car” in LaLaLand versus the “energy-saving” one in Geekville.

(Again, my experience is that the tech folks always seem to have Porsches too, much as many Hollywood slickies drive Prius hybrids.)

The story went on to talk about the arrival of Semel, whom Gaither reported was seen as not as Hollywood at first as was expected by some wary Yahoos. He then got to Braun, who apparently was.

That’s where the problems come in, first by making it seem as if Braun was responsible for the pricey lease for the new Santa Monica offices at the Colorado Center.

Actually, according to top execs like Dan Rosensweig–Braun’s direct boss–as well as sources close to Semel and many other execs involved, that facility’s planning was directed largely from Sunnyvale, as most such projects are.

Braun did give an interview when the lease was announced, but was in no way the driver of the building’s renovation, which was actually being done by the company Yahoo rented the space from.

Next, came an assertion that the execs in Santa Monica got “Hollywood-style perks,” pointing out that Braun had “converted a conference room with a patio into his personal office. He also reserved a parking space close to the elevators for his car.”

Well, Braun did have a reserved space, which was no real crime to my mind, and which was actually not particularly close to the elevators.

How do I know? I have walked Braun to his car in the parking garage, which is about as nonluxurious as it gets, as opposed to Yahoo HQ, which used valets.

More importantly, Braun converted no office space and was assigned a temporary office elsewhere during the renovation, according to a panoply of execs and workers at Yahoo, such as Rosensweig, Jeff Weiner, Scott Moore and sources close to Semel.

It was a good office–after all, Braun was the boss of the Media Group.

And while both offices did have patios, the large outdoor spaces were also kind of dingy, especially compared to the manicured lawns of Yahoo HQ. And the patios were accessible to many parts of the floors, as I noticed on my many visits.

(As an added note, after the renovations were complete, Braun’s official office was not by any means fancy and was very standard in its drone-like look.)

The worst part was the next line: “Yahoo’s top executives drew the line when Braun asked for a corporate jet,” which was followed by a stunning quote by Semel.

It read:

The reaction was basically, ‘No,’ said Semel, who does not ask Yahoo to foot the bill when he flies to Northern California in his own private plane. ‘A lot of the more traditional media companies are doing their best to scale back on some of the perks and put the investment into the products and the consumers.’”

But, top Yahoo execs have uniformly told me over the years and this week that such a request from Braun never happened.

What was actually occurring, again directed by Yahoo’s Sunnyvale HQ, was an analysis about whether the company should start a charter air shuttle for the many engineers in its Burbank facility, working on its then-Panama search project, and employees at its growing Santa Monica facility.

There could be up to 20 workers going back and forth north daily, and the Southwest Airline bills were getting high.

Thus, a look-see to determine if an L.A.-Sunnyvale shuttle for everyone was needed. But it was conceived as a less-than-high-end plane, essentially a puddle-jumper that left at 7 a.m. and came back at 7 p.m.

Braun thought it was a good idea to examine and told Rosensweig, who was in charge of looking at the charter idea. But Braun was not part of the consideration of it.

Ultimately, Semel nixed the idea as too costly, and Braun did not object.

Why Semel seemed to tell Gaither that is curious. But a person familiar with Semel’s thinking said he was only referring to an company shuttle for everyone and not a corporate jet just for Braun and his minions, as the story opaquely implied.

“The discussions over the charter had nothing to do with Lloyd,” said the person. “And he did not ever ask for a corporate jet ever.”

Rosensweig, Weiner and several other top execs at the highest echelons–many of whom did not get along with Braun–support this version, on the record.

“I never saw anything out of the ordinary or Lloyd playing by Hollywood standards,” said Vince Broady, who worked for Braun, after being brought to Yahoo by Rosensweig. “I mean, Lloyd is a colorful character, which makes people notice him, but the idea that he was more difficult than anyone else was overblown.”

There is no doubt why Braun would attract attention–he is very noticeable and had a long and bruising career in Hollywood, with lots of stories of his dishing it out. He’s a genuine character, indeed, but not really that unusual compared to others in the entertainment sector, except perhaps to some at Yahoo.

Thus, I have no doubt, though, that such a story went around that Braun did desire a jet of his own and that Gaither heard it told, just like this most incredible of anecdotes in the piece.

The infamous umbrella!

Here is what Gaither wrote:

Braun’s long career in Hollywood has led to some awkward moments and misunderstandings inside Yahoo–and provided gossipy fodder for critics eager to cast him as a technically illiterate egomaniac.

According to one widely recounted tale, on a rainy day Braun took an umbrella from the Yahoo merchandise store without paying for it. Then, when asked for payment, he reportedly berated the store clerk, asking, ‘Do you know who I am?’ In fact, Braun’s representatives say, it was an innocent question to ensure that the clerk knew he was good for the money.

A Yahoo spokeswoman said the umbrella ultimately ended up in a pool of umbrellas available to all employees.”

I could not, obviously, find the clerk to whom Braun allegedly said this. But I can say that there are free baskets of umbrellas for staffers all over Yahoo, and top execs like Braun can also buy them at company stores and just use their names as part of an account system.

And while I have no proof, the use of such a clearly hoary Hollywood phrase–“Do you know who I am?”–seems like it was simply made up to me by critics bent on making it a much better story than it was.

To be fair, Gaither does portray it as a “tale” that was circulating around Yahoo. But that probably should have alerted him that it was a very tall one indeed and not very reliable–a kind of digital urban legend rather than an actual event.

That’s why I would not have used it, without a much more explicit explanation that it was more an example of the tensions at Yahoo between the media and tech units than it was reality.

Perhaps worst of all was the impact of the piece, which forever cemented Braun’s reputation as a Hollywood-gone-wild exec.

Most interesting was that, according to both the Times and Yahoo sources, the company complained about the tone of the piece, but never asked for a correction.

Why? Sources familiar with Semel’s thinking said that he and PR execs thought it would cause more attention to focus on Braun, if they contested the piece, and it was better to just let it go.

It was probably a bad decision, given it was in the L.A. Times, which had a lot of credibility.

And, indeed, the high-profile Braun was later slapped silly by Valleywag, as the Times piece kept circulating within Yahoo. By the next year, Braun became one of the gossip blog’s first targets.

Valley–which knows a good character when it sees one and likes to poke and prod many, many such Silicon Valley-linked figures in mocking glee (with varying levels of accuracy)–even had a countdown to when Braun would be fired.

Because of this kind of thing, Braun said he tried to get Gaither to take another look at the stories about him, and met with Times editors to get them to make corrections.

The Times said Braun never formally asked for a correction and instead just complained about the story. To me, that is the same thing, but I am not privy to the Times’s internal corrections process, and Hofmeister declined to elaborate.

In any case, looking back, Braun told me this week the lack of support from Semel and Yahoo to fight the story was hugely disappointing and was the moment he realized he felt he would probably have to leave Yahoo.

Eventually, the feeling was mutual, as tensions escalated even further after the article appeared.

Braun–who had a particularly rocky relationship with Rosensweig, which is now patched up–was eventually pushed out in late 2006, after Yahoo moved away from its media focus to drill down in search.

That turned out to be a bad move, as Yahoo got its head handed to it by Google in search efforts. And it has since seriously been in tailspin in the wake of a series of jarring events.

Those include: the sudden departure of Semel mid-2007; the appointment of Co-Founder Jerry Yang as CEO; a painful public struggle to redefine Yahoo; a botched takeover fight with Microsoft (MSFT); a messy proxy battle with Carl Icahn; a collapsed search partnership with Google (GOOG); a decimated stock price; a scarily declining graphical advertising market; wrenching layoffs; and the stepping down of Yang and the thus-far uncompleted search for a new CEO.

You get the idea.

More importantly, with the cutting off of its more vaunted media aspirations, Yahoo closed the door on possible innovative directions that could have made it more competitive now, as it continues to struggle to define itself.

One of Yahoo’s great strengths–and it still is–has been its content properties, which are the most popular, by and large, on the Web. Instead, stinging from the article and the fallout of it, the company retreated from pushing forward aggressively in media.

Had it not, I can imagine a host of stuff it might have done.

And, ironically, Braun is now working on an online project with Microsoft, a celebrity site that will debut early next year and use a lots of the concepts he worked on at Yahoo.

In the 2005 piece, Gaither quoted Yahoo exec Jeff Weiner as saying, in a Yin-Yang concept: “We’re often asked, “Is Yahoo a media company or a tech company?”

Sadly, that question never got resolved then and still has not today.

It almost makes one nostalgic for stolen umbrellas, controversial parking places, questionable patios and wrangling over corporate jets.

Almost.

Comments

  1. Bravo! As CEO at JibJab, I worked with Lloyd and his new firm on a Pepsi sponsorship last year. I was blown away by the gap between my experience working with Lloyd and what I had read in the press. Lloyd’s one of the smartest, most creative people I have ever worked with and it’s great to see such a thorough rebuttal of all the stuff I could only assume was nonsense.

    Posted by gregg spiridellis at December 19th, 2008 at 11:34 am
  2. Kara, it’s great to see you do such a long-form piece – it’s a great post.

    Overall, I think you’ve nailed the problem -Yahoo never succeeded in what Gaither said: “blend the cultures, milking each for what it does best”.

    The geographic distance, the layoffs of sunnyvale people to move groups to LA, a few unfortunate hires by Lloyd, and a more top-down management style all contributed to an “us and them” rift between Santa Monica/Sunnyvale. And poor communication didn’t help – Sunnyvale employees learned more about our LA operation through Valleywag – so the salacious stories became the only reality most yahoos knew.

    In all my interactions with Lloyd, he clearly came from a different world than I, but I was generally impressed. When we presented (pre-flickr) concepts of social media to the execs, he grasped them and became an advocate. He looked at it in the way that a media/content person would– I looked at it more as a community/tech person — but he was engaged, passionate and smartly looking at it.

    In the end, I think there were plenty of flaws in the way Lloyd executed and ran his operations. But it wasn’t any of the silly things he was accused of, nor was it for lack of smarts. It’ll be interesting to see what becomes of his partnership with MSFT. If you look at some of Yahoo’s last remaining Lloyd inspired projects (OMG and Shine) we might get a hint.

    Posted by Scott Gatz at December 19th, 2008 at 12:39 pm
  3. Lloyd Braun is more than just a “colorful character.” He was MADE into an actual character on Seinfeld after he annoyed the creators of the show. This led to the “Lloyd Braun-rule” (as it is informally called in Hollywood). Writers can no longer use real peoples’ names when creating unattractive characters as payback because there are now legal ramifications.

    Posted by Emily Polsby at December 19th, 2008 at 12:41 pm
  4. Emily, Lloyd and Larry David are actually friends.
    The story is (and it may be apocryphal) that Lloyd lost a bet over a golf game. Losing meant that the most annoying character would get named after him.

    Posted by Scott Gatz at December 19th, 2008 at 12:54 pm
  5. In all honesty, I couldn’t make it through this entire article…just seems like Kara’s spending waaay too much time on details. As someone who worked DIRECTLY with Lloyd at Yahoo, and was involved with some of the stories (and many that never made it to the LA Times or other places), I can say that the spirit of those stories was, by and large, accurate.

    Obviously, some things get spun a bit far from the truth, but the reality was that Lloyd was a very, very wrong choice to lead up that division of Yahoo. Not that I dislike the man personally – I think he’s a great network TV guy – but what Yahoo needed at the time was someone with depth in the Web and technology, not another showman to match the already-too-much showiness that Terry had brought to us.

    So we can nitpick the details, and I could throw in my old tidbits, but I don’t think that’s worth anyone’s time this many years later. What it came down to was that Lloyd was not an Internet guy, and he didn’t really get Yahoo’s culture and how Web companies ran as opposed to ego-fluffing networks.

    I don’t feel sorry for Lloyd – he landed quite well, and I’m sure he’s making quite a living with his new company. Still, let’s not kid ourselves into thinking that the whole Yahoo experience was anything but ridiculous. Perhaps the only thing more ridiculous was the other Hollywood exec who walked out of Yahoo with $500M and a company that was in far worse shape than when he joined it.

    Posted by johnny stewart at December 19th, 2008 at 2:29 pm
  6. Would it be rude to call the article and the comments so far a “postmortem”?

    Posted by Mac Beach at December 19th, 2008 at 5:13 pm
  7. Well, here’s my one cent: I worked in Yahoo Center and I can tell you that offices with patios were a dime a dozen. I was a low level manager and although I shared an office most of the time, the three different spaces I worked in at the time all had patios.

    As far as the parking goes, Kara is right that the garage was hardly plush. However, I know that Semel had a prime space right next to the elevator. Saw him getting out of his black Mercedes CL65 all the time.

    And by the way, I’m pretty sure the Yahoo retail store is toast. Drove by there the other day and that space was empty. I always thought it seemed odd to have an entire store just for Yahoo branded stuff. I mean, are people really that into it?

    Posted by scott brenner at December 19th, 2008 at 7:15 pm
  8. G:

    Now is the time for a Lloyd Jib-Jab! Make sure an umbrella is involved.

    Posted by Kara Swisher at December 20th, 2008 at 12:38 am
  9. S:

    Thanks for the thoughtful comment. Lloyd was different than a typical Yahoo and by no means perfect (who is at Yahoo, as it has turned out?). But the issues are larger here about what Yahoo wanted to be then and wants to be now.

    Posted by Kara Swisher at December 20th, 2008 at 12:40 am
  10. E:

    You are right about the character, but not about why. Scott is correct. Lloyd and Larry David (Seinfeld creator) are friendly.

    Posted by Kara Swisher at December 20th, 2008 at 12:41 am
  11. J:

    That might be true or not that he was not the right person to lead that division, but those stories are simply overblown.

    I have no idea what the “spirit” of a stories means, but factually he did not do the things in that article.

    There other execs at Yahoo whose antics could be made into a caricature, and it would also not be fair.

    I think your issue is with Terry and his choices, but that’s a strategy issue and not about parking spaces and stolen umbrellas.

    Posted by Kara Swisher at December 20th, 2008 at 12:47 am
  12. M:

    Ahaha.

    Posted by Kara Swisher at December 20th, 2008 at 12:47 am
  13. S:

    Patios for all, I say!

    And Terry did indeed have a spot very close to the elevator. But not Lloyd especially.

    As for the store, I could open up one with all the dotcom swag I have.

    Posted by Kara Swisher at December 20th, 2008 at 12:49 am
  14. Kara — In the spirit of an article that is, ostensibly, about fact-checking and the need for accuracy in reporting, could you take a second look at the departure date mentioned for Braun in your article?

    Posted by Jamie Jameson at December 20th, 2008 at 10:22 am
  15. J:

    You are right. I meant 2006! Typo FIXED.

    Posted by Kara Swisher at December 21st, 2008 at 8:27 am
  16. He’d really hate me. As CEO I’d be closing offices in Santa Monica and opening them in Scottsdale. A bit of a commute, sorry Lloyd :)

    MM

    Posted by Michael Murdock at December 21st, 2008 at 10:55 am
  17. Having worked closely with Lloyd at Yahoo, (full disclosure–I was his first outside executive hire) I can state categorically that he was an asset to the company. In many ways, Yahoo’s current leadership in the media categories where it competes traces to Lloyd’s tenure. His creative spirit and desire to push the online medium to new heights drove innovation and challenged all of us to think differently about the medium. No one is perfect and Lloyd has his flaws, as do we all. The culture clash you document was (and is) real. But Lloyd set the table for the incredible run Yahoo has enjoyed in its online media properties over the past three years. The results over that period speak for themselves and stand out as a key strength for the company in terms of audience engagement and profits.

    And in spite of the “culture war” that ultimately led him to leave, I’ve never had a better boss than Lloyd. He always had my back and at the same time pushed me and the team to aim high and break new ground.

    Posted by Scott Moore at December 23rd, 2008 at 8:17 am
  18. Kara, this piece on Braun was about as interesting as peanut styrofoam. And it was about 90% too long.

    I think you’ve spent way too much time covering Yahoo and now don’t know what else to do so you’ve taken to re-writing stories from 2005 about Yahoo.

    Doesn’t anyone at WSJ edit your stuff? Or provide a check and balance for this drivel?

    In the old days journalists had to have editors approve something to make sure it was reader worthy.

    This is just pap.

    Posted by Sam Harrison at December 23rd, 2008 at 2:25 pm
  19. M:

    You keep aiming for that CEO job!

    Posted by Kara Swisher at December 28th, 2008 at 11:27 pm
  20. S:

    Thanks! How is non-Yahoo life treating you?

    Posted by Kara Swisher at December 28th, 2008 at 11:27 pm
  21. S:

    If you don’t like it, don’t read it.

    You seem perfectly satisfied when I break news on Yahoo to tout your opinion, so give me a big, hairy break.

    This was interesting to me and highly relevant.

    Posted by Kara Swisher at December 28th, 2008 at 11:28 pm
  22. Kara – A very interesting and well written post. Truth online IS important.

    Posted by Liz Gebhardt at December 29th, 2008 at 11:02 am
  23. It was delightful to see Bill and Steve sharing a stage and reminiscing about their stuff, but I was surprised that Bill (gadgets) and Steve (widgets) didn’t settle the debate about the original inventor of the widget.

    One can never have too many widgets. Somebody codes something you never even dreamed of wanting – suddenly everybody

    lig tv izle
    bedava ligtv izle
    garibim
    deyimler
    şiir türleriçetchatsohbet needs a whole bunch of widgets because they don’t impinge too much on the screen/template real estate.

    Posted by erdem ela at April 17th, 2009 at 10:40 pm

Add a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment. Sign up here or log in below.

Comments posted on this site must be signed with your full, real name. Please see our Comments policy for details.

Latest BoomTown Videos

More Videos »

About Kara

Kara Swisher started covering digital issues for The Wall Street Journal's San Francisco bureau in 1997 and also wrote the BoomTown column about the sector. With Walt Mossberg, she co-produces and co-hosts D: All Things Digital, a major high-tech and media conference. Read more »

Ethics Statement

Here is a statement of my ethics and coverage policies. It is more than most of you want to know, but, in the age of suspicion of the media, I am laying it all out.

Read more »