<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skype&#8211;the Twitter of Yesteryear&#8211;Hypes Web Telephone on Television (Plus: Biz Talks Biz!)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090325/skype-the-twitter-of-yesteryear-hypes-web-telephone-on-television-plus-biz-talks-biz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090325/skype-the-twitter-of-yesteryear-hypes-web-telephone-on-television-plus-biz-talks-biz/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niki Scevak</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090325/skype-the-twitter-of-yesteryear-hypes-web-telephone-on-television-plus-biz-talks-biz/#comment-9357</link>
		<dc:creator>Niki Scevak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 01:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=11299#comment-9357</guid>
		<description>How did you possibly justify this statement alongside the graphic: &quot;Skype’s lackluster performance has made many think it was a very bad acquisition for eBay (EBAY), which paid $2.6 billion for it in 2005. &quot;

The firm has increased revenue more than ten-fold and is still showing healthy growth.

The definition of a bad investment is one in which you cannot sell for more than you paid at a pretty basic level.

With the current trajectory and even the crappy market, the firm would be able to get at least its initial purchase price if it wanted.

I am not saying it&#039;s a bargain or a home run but it&#039;s pretty much a fair acquisition at what has turned out to be a fair price.

If you don&#039;t agree, what figure would they be able to get in your mind such that it would be considered a bad acquisition?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did you possibly justify this statement alongside the graphic: &#8220;Skype’s lackluster performance has made many think it was a very bad acquisition for eBay (EBAY), which paid $2.6 billion for it in 2005. &#8221;</p>
<p>The firm has increased revenue more than ten-fold and is still showing healthy growth.</p>
<p>The definition of a bad investment is one in which you cannot sell for more than you paid at a pretty basic level.</p>
<p>With the current trajectory and even the crappy market, the firm would be able to get at least its initial purchase price if it wanted.</p>
<p>I am not saying it&#8217;s a bargain or a home run but it&#8217;s pretty much a fair acquisition at what has turned out to be a fair price.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t agree, what figure would they be able to get in your mind such that it would be considered a bad acquisition?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
