Ballmer’s Not-So-Idle Threat to Yahoo: Do You Feel Lucky?
Several years ago, when I once asked Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer if the software giant was ever going to be able to catch No. 1 Google in market share in the increasingly lucrative search arena–despite years of trying and billions in investment in its Web businesses overall–he said something I shall never forget.
“We don’t actually have to catch the leader,” said the pugnacious tech leader. “We just have to surpass the No. 2 to have a great business.”
At the time, Ballmer meant Yahoo (YHOO), of course, and his intention was clear to me. While it was probably well-nigh impossible to get into the pole position Google (GOOG) is in, Microsoft could begin an attack if it could crush Yahoo first.
Easier said than done, of course, with little movement in share so far–even after early labored and expensive organic efforts, a failed takeover attempt to buy Yahoo and endless but still fruitless talks about a partnership with the Internet giant.
But now with a very credible and consumer-friendly revamped service called Bing, which is getting a big slug of marketing money, Microsoft (MSFT) might actually have a product that at least has a better chance to gain market share.
While by no means certain or lasting, early results from surveys are promising and–combined with distribution deals the software giant recently signed too–could give Microsoft the kind of momentum is has long needed.
This is obviously not good news for Yahoo, which will doubtlessly be the one losing market share if it is to be lost.
Nonetheless, some think Google might be more impacted since its users make a conscious choice to use it and Bing is a direct alternative in this regard, while Yahoo’s users use search when they are using other parts of the site. (See comments below, which make excellent points.)
But, in any developing arms wars, it is not a good idea to get caught between monied giants and Yahoo needs to make sure it does not become the grass in an elephant battle.
In a recent onstage interview with me at the seventh D: All Things Digital conference, in fact, Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz said Yahoo definitely needed to maintain its 20 percent share.
Bad news for her then, when yesterday Ballmer shot another one across the Yahoo bow, by telling a group of business execs at a luncheon:
“Our shareholders, I told them we were willing to spend 5 to 10 percent of operating income for up to five years in this business, and we feel like we can get an economic return.”
Since it is cash-spewing Microsoft–more than $20 billion in operating income last year–that’s a lot of money.
And, even if history has not been kind of Microsoft’s like-a-drunken-sailor spending before in the Internet space, there is no question the company has an obsessive commitment to eventually gain ground, grinding down companies like Yahoo if need be.
And within the larger context of Ballmer and Bartz in hot-and-cold discussions about a search and advertising partnership deal, his statement is clearly a signal to Yahoo to get on the Microsoft train or run the risk of getting run over.
Thus, Bartz has got to ask herself one question as she ponders what to do: Do I feel lucky?
Speaking of which, here is a video of the classic scene from Clint Eastwood in “Dirty Harry” uttering those words:






Comments
Not sure why you think bing will take marketshare from Yahoo search. Maybe a little bit, but I think the bulk will come from Google. Most Yahoo searches are organic in the sense that they come from people already on Yahoo for other reasons and the search box is right there on their MyYahoo starting page, the http://www.yahoo frontpage, their finance page, etc. Bing is a standalone search engine like Google is, so I think Google is much more exposed by Bing than Yahoo is. Most Google searches are non-organic and people make a conscious decision to go search on Google. If marketing and search quality of Bing can sway that decision, Google is likely to lose some market share. I don’t think the people who come to Yahoo for the Yahoo network content are anywhere near as easy to convert.
Posted by Joe User at June 19th, 2009 at 10:26 amIf search engine results were the only merit, Yahoo’s share would have gone down much below 20% already.
Yes, Bing is more likely to take the search share away from Google.
Posted by Puneet Thapliyal at June 19th, 2009 at 10:53 amJ, P:
Interesting points, but Ballmer’s message was that he was doubling down. Yahoo simply cannot afford to keep up with either Google or Microsoft in this arms race.
But I will add your point above, as it is an excellent one.
Posted by Kara Swisher at June 19th, 2009 at 3:49 pmKara you should not be pumping this deal, at this time. Yahoo’s stock is at a PE of 1400 and MSFT is under 14. Yahoo needs big bucks to justify that stock price (much less upside) and MSFT needs to get a bargain or it’s stock would tank, when it’s now gaining traction.
Posted by Jeff Stevens at June 19th, 2009 at 4:01 pmHowever the caption fits, for both. Who feels lucky!
J:
I am not pumping anything. Just saying Ballmer is playing hardball and it could have some impact on Yahoo.
But excellent points.
Posted by Kara Swisher at June 19th, 2009 at 6:58 pm