<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Apple Shares Keep Defying Gravity?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090928/can-apple-shares-keep-defying-gravity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090928/can-apple-shares-keep-defying-gravity/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FateMaster Tech News &#187; Wall Street Hopes Apple Doesn&#8217;t Fall Far From the Tree [BoomTown]</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090928/can-apple-shares-keep-defying-gravity/#comment-17943</link>
		<dc:creator>FateMaster Tech News &#187; Wall Street Hopes Apple Doesn&#8217;t Fall Far From the Tree [BoomTown]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=18898#comment-17943</guid>
		<description>[...] And, of course, the stock has been showing all this investor love by&#8211;as BoomTown has noted recently&#8211;defying gravity. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And, of course, the stock has been showing all this investor love by&#8211;as BoomTown has noted recently&#8211;defying gravity. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lenny Pudinskaya</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090928/can-apple-shares-keep-defying-gravity/#comment-17160</link>
		<dc:creator>Lenny Pudinskaya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=18898#comment-17160</guid>
		<description>Jeff wrote: &quot;just what, may i ask is the purpose of printing such a biased negative view?&quot;

Kara Swisher worships at temple Microsoft, as does all every one here at All Things D. 
Apple is the hated enemy of all Microsoft egoists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff wrote: &#8220;just what, may i ask is the purpose of printing such a biased negative view?&#8221;</p>
<p>Kara Swisher worships at temple Microsoft, as does all every one here at All Things D.<br />
Apple is the hated enemy of all Microsoft egoists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechKive &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Can Apple Shares Keep Defying Gravity? [BoomTown]</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090928/can-apple-shares-keep-defying-gravity/#comment-17150</link>
		<dc:creator>TechKive &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Can Apple Shares Keep Defying Gravity? [BoomTown]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 02:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=18898#comment-17150</guid>
		<description>[...] Can Apple Shares Keep Defying Gravity? [BoomTown]   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Can Apple Shares Keep Defying Gravity? [BoomTown]   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Stornetta</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090928/can-apple-shares-keep-defying-gravity/#comment-17148</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Stornetta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=18898#comment-17148</guid>
		<description>There is no analysis here of the valuation.  The stock has recovered to its pre-recession range, which is hardly surprising, given the outstanding performance it has had in the midst of the recession, particularly relative to its comparables. Also, posting a youtube video that has more to do with your headline than it has to do with the company you are discussing does not count as supporting evidence for your argument.


While I don&#039;t question your motives, and assume you are trying to contribute, this is a schlock piece, and is not worthy of the wall street journal. 

The U.S. stock market, taking the long-term view, has continued to rise for two centuries.  How long can it &quot;defy gravity?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no analysis here of the valuation.  The stock has recovered to its pre-recession range, which is hardly surprising, given the outstanding performance it has had in the midst of the recession, particularly relative to its comparables. Also, posting a youtube video that has more to do with your headline than it has to do with the company you are discussing does not count as supporting evidence for your argument.</p>
<p>While I don&#8217;t question your motives, and assume you are trying to contribute, this is a schlock piece, and is not worthy of the wall street journal. </p>
<p>The U.S. stock market, taking the long-term view, has continued to rise for two centuries.  How long can it &#8220;defy gravity?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff shore</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090928/can-apple-shares-keep-defying-gravity/#comment-17147</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff shore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=18898#comment-17147</guid>
		<description>errata:

sorry, please read 12% as being the difference in price between $186 and $ 210 in para 7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>errata:</p>
<p>sorry, please read 12% as being the difference in price between $186 and $ 210 in para 7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff shore</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090928/can-apple-shares-keep-defying-gravity/#comment-17145</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff shore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 23:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=18898#comment-17145</guid>
		<description>i can&#039;t but wonder what the intent of this piece is.

just what, may i ask is the purpose of printing such a biased negative view? just what is your motive?

for surely, if there was to be any semblance of &#039;fair&#039; reporting, you would have looked at and tried to understand the elements behind the stock price. no, instead you just state it as defying gravity.
you fail to mention that that the stock price has merely recovered the ground it has lost since its peak in jan 08.

indeed, the other companies you compare apple&#039;s price to, are mostly recovering. only slower.  there are many good reasons why this is so. could it be that this largely reflects the fact that apple is weathering the economic downturn comparatively better and is poised for further growth?

apple is in the enviable position,of being THE company all others want to imitate. and sadly, that is all they do -imitate, rather than innovate. (despicable).

apple, through innovation,  best marketing, best product design, best retailing, best customer support, best business plan, best cost structure, best execution... has become one of the worlds most admired companies. an exclusive, high growth brand, with deservedly high margins and phenomenal cash generation.

you make mention of your bewilderment -&quot; if the froth can reach that level&quot;- ie, apple&#039;s &#039;already high&#039; shares attaining $210 vs $186 today. this 25% increment is negligible, particularly in the context of current unpredictable market swings. the relevant question is whether apple can double in the next 18 months.

i question, from your perfunctory  attempt at value analysis, whether you should curtail your economic refections and concentrate on technical digital reporting, which i assume to be  your forte.

again, your piece is not about fair reporting, it is a biased, one-sided opinion and i cannot but enquire as to what lies behind it and what your motives may indeed be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i can&#8217;t but wonder what the intent of this piece is.</p>
<p>just what, may i ask is the purpose of printing such a biased negative view? just what is your motive?</p>
<p>for surely, if there was to be any semblance of &#8216;fair&#8217; reporting, you would have looked at and tried to understand the elements behind the stock price. no, instead you just state it as defying gravity.<br />
you fail to mention that that the stock price has merely recovered the ground it has lost since its peak in jan 08.</p>
<p>indeed, the other companies you compare apple&#8217;s price to, are mostly recovering. only slower.  there are many good reasons why this is so. could it be that this largely reflects the fact that apple is weathering the economic downturn comparatively better and is poised for further growth?</p>
<p>apple is in the enviable position,of being THE company all others want to imitate. and sadly, that is all they do -imitate, rather than innovate. (despicable).</p>
<p>apple, through innovation,  best marketing, best product design, best retailing, best customer support, best business plan, best cost structure, best execution&#8230; has become one of the worlds most admired companies. an exclusive, high growth brand, with deservedly high margins and phenomenal cash generation.</p>
<p>you make mention of your bewilderment -&#8221; if the froth can reach that level&#8221;- ie, apple&#8217;s &#8216;already high&#8217; shares attaining $210 vs $186 today. this 25% increment is negligible, particularly in the context of current unpredictable market swings. the relevant question is whether apple can double in the next 18 months.</p>
<p>i question, from your perfunctory  attempt at value analysis, whether you should curtail your economic refections and concentrate on technical digital reporting, which i assume to be  your forte.</p>
<p>again, your piece is not about fair reporting, it is a biased, one-sided opinion and i cannot but enquire as to what lies behind it and what your motives may indeed be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can Apple Shares Keep Defying Gravity? &#124; MacRevu</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090928/can-apple-shares-keep-defying-gravity/#comment-17138</link>
		<dc:creator>Can Apple Shares Keep Defying Gravity? &#124; MacRevu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=18898#comment-17138</guid>
		<description>[...] Can Apple Shares Keep Defying Gravity?  All Things Digital &#8211; 1 hour ago  by Kara Swisher Since the beginning of the year, Apple shares have more than doubled from $90.75 on January 2 to almost $186 today. Google (GOOG) has done about half that performance, while &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Can Apple Shares Keep Defying Gravity?  All Things Digital &#8211; 1 hour ago  by Kara Swisher Since the beginning of the year, Apple shares have more than doubled from $90.75 on January 2 to almost $186 today. Google (GOOG) has done about half that performance, while &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Cioffi</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090928/can-apple-shares-keep-defying-gravity/#comment-17134</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Cioffi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=18898#comment-17134</guid>
		<description>I think the stock is where it should be, after being smacked along with the crash (mutual funds sold good stocks to raise cash to pay for the losses). The &quot;March lows&quot; may not be as relevant as many think.

AAPL will always be volatile, as it is heavily traded, but I believe this is a $1000 stock in 10 years, because of:

-growing Mac market share gains
-iPhone is just getting started
-devices we are not yet aware of</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the stock is where it should be, after being smacked along with the crash (mutual funds sold good stocks to raise cash to pay for the losses). The &#8220;March lows&#8221; may not be as relevant as many think.</p>
<p>AAPL will always be volatile, as it is heavily traded, but I believe this is a $1000 stock in 10 years, because of:</p>
<p>-growing Mac market share gains<br />
-iPhone is just getting started<br />
-devices we are not yet aware of</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friends of Dave (friendsofdave) 's status on Monday, 28-Sep-09 18:48:18 UTC - Identi.ca</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090928/can-apple-shares-keep-defying-gravity/#comment-17133</link>
		<dc:creator>Friends of Dave (friendsofdave) 's status on Monday, 28-Sep-09 18:48:18 UTC - Identi.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=18898#comment-17133</guid>
		<description>[...]  http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090928/can-apple-shares-keep-defying-gravity/        a few seconds ago  from api [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090928/can-apple-shares-keep-defying-gravity/" rel="nofollow">http://kara.allthingsd.com/200.....g-gravity/</a>        a few seconds ago  from api [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

