<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Demand Media Is Mad as Hell and, Well, Pens a Manifesto (And Here It Is!)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20100111/demand-media-is-mad-as-hell-and-well-pens-a-manifesto-and-here-it-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20100111/demand-media-is-mad-as-hell-and-well-pens-a-manifesto-and-here-it-is/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demand Media: A Story in 5 Numbers</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20100111/demand-media-is-mad-as-hell-and-well-pens-a-manifesto-and-here-it-is/#comment-40797</link>
		<dc:creator>Demand Media: A Story in 5 Numbers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 09:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=22793#comment-40797</guid>
		<description>[...] Kara Swisher responded at All Things Digital with Demand Media Is Mad as Hell and, Well, Pens a Manifesto (And Here It Is!) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kara Swisher responded at All Things Digital with Demand Media Is Mad as Hell and, Well, Pens a Manifesto (And Here It Is!) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reklam</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20100111/demand-media-is-mad-as-hell-and-well-pens-a-manifesto-and-here-it-is/#comment-32633</link>
		<dc:creator>reklam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 14:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=22793#comment-32633</guid>
		<description>thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demand Media in rumored IPO &#124; DomainIncite.com - Domain Name News &#38; Opinion</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20100111/demand-media-is-mad-as-hell-and-well-pens-a-manifesto-and-here-it-is/#comment-28417</link>
		<dc:creator>Demand Media in rumored IPO &#124; DomainIncite.com - Domain Name News &#38; Opinion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=22793#comment-28417</guid>
		<description>[...] thought of as a “content mill”, Demand is in the business of mining search and domain data and pumping out content which it can [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] thought of as a “content mill”, Demand is in the business of mining search and domain data and pumping out content which it can [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: demandwriter</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20100111/demand-media-is-mad-as-hell-and-well-pens-a-manifesto-and-here-it-is/#comment-26492</link>
		<dc:creator>demandwriter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=22793#comment-26492</guid>
		<description>Ehow writers? You mean those that submit content on their own without the benefit of being edited? Demand Studio writers do get paid (twice a week like clockwork) and we do have health insurance and we do have a grant program for creative projects. If the EHow writers who are self submitting want to be paid, they should apply to become Demand Studio writers. We really do have fun over there and it is a good way to earn some cashola.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ehow writers? You mean those that submit content on their own without the benefit of being edited? Demand Studio writers do get paid (twice a week like clockwork) and we do have health insurance and we do have a grant program for creative projects. If the EHow writers who are self submitting want to be paid, they should apply to become Demand Studio writers. We really do have fun over there and it is a good way to earn some cashola.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Media &#187; Yahoo top ad moneymaker leaving for Demand Media</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20100111/demand-media-is-mad-as-hell-and-well-pens-a-manifesto-and-here-it-is/#comment-26382</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Media &#187; Yahoo top ad moneymaker leaving for Demand Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=22793#comment-26382</guid>
		<description>[...] &#097;&#116; the characterization &#111;&#102; Demand &#097;&#115; a content spammer, Rosenblatt even issued a manifesto for Demand &#105;&#110; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#97;&#116; the characterization &#111;&#102; Demand &#97;&#115; a content spammer, Rosenblatt even issued a manifesto for Demand &#105;&#110; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thepreacher56</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20100111/demand-media-is-mad-as-hell-and-well-pens-a-manifesto-and-here-it-is/#comment-25811</link>
		<dc:creator>thepreacher56</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 12:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=22793#comment-25811</guid>
		<description>THE ART OF THE $80 SCAM  Posted by THE PREACHER at 05:26 AM on March 06, 2010 	 comments (0) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water, along comes that greedy ehow shark once again.  This time they are pulling off the art of the $80 scam.  Say what?  Sounds kind of silly, until you begin to see the entire picture.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Back a while ago ehow announced it would begin to pay out $80 per article to hand selected ehow writers.  Needless to say, many became excited at the thought of making $80 per article compared to the peanuts they had been paid up intil now.  So people began to ask, how can we get in on the deal.  Well, don&#039;t saddle up the horse just yet.  If you know anything about ehow, its that they have mastered the art of double speak.  No no, we didn&#039;t mean you ehow writers, we meant DS writers who also place their articles onto ehow.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;that&#039;s what we meant to say when we said ehow writers.  DS writers.  So many just threw up their hands and passed the whole thing off as yet  one more example of ehows lack of communication. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But was it really a lack of communication, or was something else much darker taking place, something well thought out ahead of time?  Glad you asked.  Breaking in blogs and news stories all across the UK yesterday was stories cheering on the arrival of ehow, proclaiming that ehow pays its top writers $80 per article.  Now I would like to think my mama didn&#039;t raise any fools, and you can smell this skunk a mile away.  Ehow knew exactly what it was doing when it announced ehow writers would be making $80 an article, when in fact it wasn&#039;t talking about ehow writers at all.  That statement was put out there so they could feed it to a news hungry media over in the UK, and the UK took the bait without as much as asking any questions at all of ehow.  In bold pring, ehow to pay writers $80 nan article.  Unbelievable,  Once again ehow the esow has proven they are indeed the kings when it comes to making dimes do the work of dollars.  And talk about free press.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have news for our over seas friends, they are about to be hit with one of the biggest scam machines out there.  ehow writers do not get paid $80 per article nor will they ever get paid that much.  &lt;br&gt;Another story put it this way, some ehow writers will get paid $80 an article, while others can expect to make between $3 to $75 per article.  Say what?  Poor bastards, they don&#039;t know what&#039;s about to hit them.  This sow can&#039;t squeal, and there ain&#039;t enough scraps in the UK to satisfy its hunger.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Check out this news story and see how misleading ehow has been with the $80 per article scam they are now running.   &lt;a href=&quot;http://psmithjournalist.com/2010/03/exclusive-demand-media-now-accepting-uk-canadian-freelance-writers/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://psmithjournalist.com/2010/03/exclusive-d...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE ART OF THE $80 SCAM  Posted by THE PREACHER at 05:26 AM on March 06, 2010 	 comments (0) </p>
<p>Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water, along comes that greedy ehow shark once again.  This time they are pulling off the art of the $80 scam.  Say what?  Sounds kind of silly, until you begin to see the entire picture.</p>
<p>Back a while ago ehow announced it would begin to pay out $80 per article to hand selected ehow writers.  Needless to say, many became excited at the thought of making $80 per article compared to the peanuts they had been paid up intil now.  So people began to ask, how can we get in on the deal.  Well, don&#39;t saddle up the horse just yet.  If you know anything about ehow, its that they have mastered the art of double speak.  No no, we didn&#39;t mean you ehow writers, we meant DS writers who also place their articles onto ehow.  </p>
<p>that&#39;s what we meant to say when we said ehow writers.  DS writers.  So many just threw up their hands and passed the whole thing off as yet  one more example of ehows lack of communication. </p>
<p>But was it really a lack of communication, or was something else much darker taking place, something well thought out ahead of time?  Glad you asked.  Breaking in blogs and news stories all across the UK yesterday was stories cheering on the arrival of ehow, proclaiming that ehow pays its top writers $80 per article.  Now I would like to think my mama didn&#39;t raise any fools, and you can smell this skunk a mile away.  Ehow knew exactly what it was doing when it announced ehow writers would be making $80 an article, when in fact it wasn&#39;t talking about ehow writers at all.  That statement was put out there so they could feed it to a news hungry media over in the UK, and the UK took the bait without as much as asking any questions at all of ehow.  In bold pring, ehow to pay writers $80 nan article.  Unbelievable,  Once again ehow the esow has proven they are indeed the kings when it comes to making dimes do the work of dollars.  And talk about free press.</p>
<p>I have news for our over seas friends, they are about to be hit with one of the biggest scam machines out there.  ehow writers do not get paid $80 per article nor will they ever get paid that much.  <br />Another story put it this way, some ehow writers will get paid $80 an article, while others can expect to make between $3 to $75 per article.  Say what?  Poor bastards, they don&#39;t know what&#39;s about to hit them.  This sow can&#39;t squeal, and there ain&#39;t enough scraps in the UK to satisfy its hunger.  </p>
<p>Check out this news story and see how misleading ehow has been with the $80 per article scam they are now running.   <a href="http://psmithjournalist.com/2010/03/exclusive-demand-media-now-accepting-uk-canadian-freelance-writers/" rel="nofollow">http://psmithjournalist.com/20.....e-d&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thepreacher56</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20100111/demand-media-is-mad-as-hell-and-well-pens-a-manifesto-and-here-it-is/#comment-25810</link>
		<dc:creator>thepreacher56</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 04:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=22793#comment-25810</guid>
		<description>THE ART OF THE $80 SCAM  Posted by THE PREACHER at 05:26 AM on March 06, 2010 	 comments (0) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water, along comes that greedy ehow shark once again.  This time they are pulling off the art of the $80 scam.  Say what?  Sounds kind of silly, until you begin to see the entire picture.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Back a while ago ehow announced it would begin to pay out $80 per article to hand selected ehow writers.  Needless to say, many became excited at the thought of making $80 per article compared to the peanuts they had been paid up intil now.  So people began to ask, how can we get in on the deal.  Well, don&#039;t saddle up the horse just yet.  If you know anything about ehow, its that they have mastered the art of double speak.  No no, we didn&#039;t mean you ehow writers, we meant DS writers who also place their articles onto ehow.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;that&#039;s what we meant to say when we said ehow writers.  DS writers.  So many just threw up their hands and passed the whole thing off as yet  one more example of ehows lack of communication. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But was it really a lack of communication, or was something else much darker taking place, something well thought out ahead of time?  Glad you asked.  Breaking in blogs and news stories all across the UK yesterday was stories cheering on the arrival of ehow, proclaiming that ehow pays its top writers $80 per article.  Now I would like to think my mama didn&#039;t raise any fools, and you can smell this skunk a mile away.  Ehow knew exactly what it was doing when it announced ehow writers would be making $80 an article, when in fact it wasn&#039;t talking about ehow writers at all.  That statement was put out there so they could feed it to a news hungry media over in the UK, and the UK took the bait without as much as asking any questions at all of ehow.  In bold pring, ehow to pay writers $80 nan article.  Unbelievable,  Once again ehow the esow has proven they are indeed the kings when it comes to making dimes do the work of dollars.  And talk about free press.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have news for our over seas friends, they are about to be hit with one of the biggest scam machines out there.  ehow writers do not get paid $80 per article nor will they ever get paid that much.  &lt;br&gt;Another story put it this way, some ehow writers will get paid $80 an article, while others can expect to make between $3 to $75 per article.  Say what?  Poor bastards, they don&#039;t know what&#039;s about to hit them.  This sow can&#039;t squeal, and there ain&#039;t enough scraps in the UK to satisfy its hunger.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Check out this news story and see how misleading ehow has been with the $80 per article scam they are now running.   &lt;a href=&quot;http://psmithjournalist.com/2010/03/exclusive-demand-media-now-accepting-uk-canadian-freelance-writers/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://psmithjournalist.com/2010/03/exclusive-d...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE ART OF THE $80 SCAM  Posted by THE PREACHER at 05:26 AM on March 06, 2010 	 comments (0) </p>
<p>Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water, along comes that greedy ehow shark once again.  This time they are pulling off the art of the $80 scam.  Say what?  Sounds kind of silly, until you begin to see the entire picture.</p>
<p>Back a while ago ehow announced it would begin to pay out $80 per article to hand selected ehow writers.  Needless to say, many became excited at the thought of making $80 per article compared to the peanuts they had been paid up intil now.  So people began to ask, how can we get in on the deal.  Well, don&#39;t saddle up the horse just yet.  If you know anything about ehow, its that they have mastered the art of double speak.  No no, we didn&#39;t mean you ehow writers, we meant DS writers who also place their articles onto ehow.  </p>
<p>that&#39;s what we meant to say when we said ehow writers.  DS writers.  So many just threw up their hands and passed the whole thing off as yet  one more example of ehows lack of communication. </p>
<p>But was it really a lack of communication, or was something else much darker taking place, something well thought out ahead of time?  Glad you asked.  Breaking in blogs and news stories all across the UK yesterday was stories cheering on the arrival of ehow, proclaiming that ehow pays its top writers $80 per article.  Now I would like to think my mama didn&#39;t raise any fools, and you can smell this skunk a mile away.  Ehow knew exactly what it was doing when it announced ehow writers would be making $80 an article, when in fact it wasn&#39;t talking about ehow writers at all.  That statement was put out there so they could feed it to a news hungry media over in the UK, and the UK took the bait without as much as asking any questions at all of ehow.  In bold pring, ehow to pay writers $80 nan article.  Unbelievable,  Once again ehow the esow has proven they are indeed the kings when it comes to making dimes do the work of dollars.  And talk about free press.</p>
<p>I have news for our over seas friends, they are about to be hit with one of the biggest scam machines out there.  ehow writers do not get paid $80 per article nor will they ever get paid that much.  <br />Another story put it this way, some ehow writers will get paid $80 an article, while others can expect to make between $3 to $75 per article.  Say what?  Poor bastards, they don&#39;t know what&#39;s about to hit them.  This sow can&#39;t squeal, and there ain&#39;t enough scraps in the UK to satisfy its hunger.  </p>
<p>Check out this news story and see how misleading ehow has been with the $80 per article scam they are now running.   <a href="http://psmithjournalist.com/2010/03/exclusive-demand-media-now-accepting-uk-canadian-freelance-writers/" rel="nofollow">http://psmithjournalist.com/20.....e-d&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Large-Scale Content-Creation Sites &#124; Managing Greatness</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20100111/demand-media-is-mad-as-hell-and-well-pens-a-manifesto-and-here-it-is/#comment-24570</link>
		<dc:creator>Large-Scale Content-Creation Sites &#124; Managing Greatness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=22793#comment-24570</guid>
		<description>[...] recent articles in the New York Times, TechCrunch, and All Things D have brought some clarity and insight to the issues surrounding large-scale content-creation sites. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recent articles in the New York Times, TechCrunch, and All Things D have brought some clarity and insight to the issues surrounding large-scale content-creation sites. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glorybug</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20100111/demand-media-is-mad-as-hell-and-well-pens-a-manifesto-and-here-it-is/#comment-24071</link>
		<dc:creator>glorybug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 07:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=22793#comment-24071</guid>
		<description>Thank you, martyphis, that makes more sense.  I feel sorry for anyone who had a well-written article swept, but considering some of the really bad articles still up on eHow, I wish they were even more strict about quality. I&#039;ve seen one writer who wrote 330 articles last year.  All about credit, mortgages, money, etc.  Not one has ANY information in them, and every article has 4 separate sentences ordering the reader to click on the affiliate link they list in resources.  That&#039;s 330 articles breaking eHow rules, yet they&#039;re still there.  I&#039;ve seen articles I can&#039;t even read because of the typos, lack of info, and not speaking English well.  I really liked eHow when I first started.  Then I saw how low their quality standards are, how they allow flat rate writers to compete directly with eHow writers, how they use inner ads to divert readers to flat rate writers&#039; pages... by the time the UK thing happened, I didn&#039;t like them so much.  I want to be associated with sites that have standards, values and ethics- all of which Demand Media is lacking right now.  They own eHow, and they allow eHow to be a content mill, so it&#039;s ridiculous that they are angry about being called out on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, martyphis, that makes more sense.  I feel sorry for anyone who had a well-written article swept, but considering some of the really bad articles still up on eHow, I wish they were even more strict about quality. I&#39;ve seen one writer who wrote 330 articles last year.  All about credit, mortgages, money, etc.  Not one has ANY information in them, and every article has 4 separate sentences ordering the reader to click on the affiliate link they list in resources.  That&#39;s 330 articles breaking eHow rules, yet they&#39;re still there.  I&#39;ve seen articles I can&#39;t even read because of the typos, lack of info, and not speaking English well.  I really liked eHow when I first started.  Then I saw how low their quality standards are, how they allow flat rate writers to compete directly with eHow writers, how they use inner ads to divert readers to flat rate writers&#39; pages&#8230; by the time the UK thing happened, I didn&#39;t like them so much.  I want to be associated with sites that have standards, values and ethics- all of which Demand Media is lacking right now.  They own eHow, and they allow eHow to be a content mill, so it&#39;s ridiculous that they are angry about being called out on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1oftheminions</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20100111/demand-media-is-mad-as-hell-and-well-pens-a-manifesto-and-here-it-is/#comment-24007</link>
		<dc:creator>1oftheminions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=22793#comment-24007</guid>
		<description>I quite eHow because of their smarmy business practices, such as the way they discriminate based on how much traffic your content pulls in. They have all these guidelines, but if you&#039;re a doctor who was thrown out of the practice, and who breaks every single guideline they espouse, but you&#039;re pulling major traffic, they just ignore the thousands of requests they get from their writers to take you down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I quite eHow because of their smarmy business practices, such as the way they discriminate based on how much traffic your content pulls in. They have all these guidelines, but if you&#39;re a doctor who was thrown out of the practice, and who breaks every single guideline they espouse, but you&#39;re pulling major traffic, they just ignore the thousands of requests they get from their writers to take you down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20100111/demand-media-is-mad-as-hell-and-well-pens-a-manifesto-and-here-it-is/#comment-58824</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 13:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=22793#comment-58824</guid>
		<description>First, you are entitled to you opions. Are you new to eHow?

The lack of transparency is the biggest issue. I work in the IT industry, and I am very familiar with writing and publishing terms of service, privacy statements, etc. for web sites. The terms of service and writers compensation program rules are not written in a clear, concise manner.

EHow tried to empower their memebrship. They off-loaded the burden of monitoring members&#039; activities to the point that no one, even eHow, knows what the rules really are. The big &quot;R&quot; [retrograde] is buried in his/her own BS.

Ehow.com is a site that the FTC needs to take a close look at. A class action suit on behalf of writers would be appropriate. Has anyone looked into the past accusations our Federal Government has made about the key players in the Demand Media/Ehow organization?

No wonder the owners want to sell out. Dump and run before the whole thing collapses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, you are entitled to you opions. Are you new to eHow?</p>
<p>The lack of transparency is the biggest issue. I work in the IT industry, and I am very familiar with writing and publishing terms of service, privacy statements, etc. for web sites. The terms of service and writers compensation program rules are not written in a clear, concise manner.</p>
<p>EHow tried to empower their memebrship. They off-loaded the burden of monitoring members&#8217; activities to the point that no one, even eHow, knows what the rules really are. The big &#8220;R&#8221; [retrograde] is buried in his/her own BS.</p>
<p>Ehow.com is a site that the FTC needs to take a close look at. A class action suit on behalf of writers would be appropriate. Has anyone looked into the past accusations our Federal Government has made about the key players in the Demand Media/Ehow organization?</p>
<p>No wonder the owners want to sell out. Dump and run before the whole thing collapses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20100111/demand-media-is-mad-as-hell-and-well-pens-a-manifesto-and-here-it-is/#comment-58823</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 08:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=22793#comment-58823</guid>
		<description>I find it interesting that Mr. Rosenblatt thought so little of Demand Media&#039;s eHow writers that he doesn&#039;t include them in his manifesto.  I question a company that understands everyday people so little that they don&#039;t want to bother providing everyday needs, such as paying writers for their work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it interesting that Mr. Rosenblatt thought so little of Demand Media&#8217;s eHow writers that he doesn&#8217;t include them in his manifesto.  I question a company that understands everyday people so little that they don&#8217;t want to bother providing everyday needs, such as paying writers for their work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glorybug</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20100111/demand-media-is-mad-as-hell-and-well-pens-a-manifesto-and-here-it-is/#comment-23977</link>
		<dc:creator>glorybug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 04:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=22793#comment-23977</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to know what &#039;rules&#039; the disgruntled writers for eHow supposedly ignored.  I read the forums, and it appears most disgruntled writers simply didn&#039;t take kindly to having their articles pimped out to another country without being paid for it.  Others are frustrated by not knowing what their pay is based on to begin with.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But you can thank them when you receive back compensation in February, because it is those &#039;disgruntled writers&#039; that caused eHow to announce yesterday that they would pay back &#039;some&#039; vague amount of stolen earnings.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mr. Rosenblatt conveniently fails to address eHow writers when he claims- &quot;We transparently pay a range of rates for various roles and assignments, and we generally target an hourly rate comparable with the average salary of a journalist. We’ve even created a program that enables frequent contributors to gain access to affordable health insurance and a grant program that helps them pursue their creative aspirations.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;eHow writers do not get any of those perks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;d like to know what &#39;rules&#39; the disgruntled writers for eHow supposedly ignored.  I read the forums, and it appears most disgruntled writers simply didn&#39;t take kindly to having their articles pimped out to another country without being paid for it.  Others are frustrated by not knowing what their pay is based on to begin with.</p>
<p>But you can thank them when you receive back compensation in February, because it is those &#39;disgruntled writers&#39; that caused eHow to announce yesterday that they would pay back &#39;some&#39; vague amount of stolen earnings.</p>
<p>Mr. Rosenblatt conveniently fails to address eHow writers when he claims- &#8220;We transparently pay a range of rates for various roles and assignments, and we generally target an hourly rate comparable with the average salary of a journalist. We’ve even created a program that enables frequent contributors to gain access to affordable health insurance and a grant program that helps them pursue their creative aspirations.&#8221;</p>
<p>eHow writers do not get any of those perks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20100111/demand-media-is-mad-as-hell-and-well-pens-a-manifesto-and-here-it-is/#comment-58822</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 03:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=22793#comment-58822</guid>
		<description>Glorybug, I think DianeCass is talking about those disgruntled writers who left eHow because they did not follow the rules for writing, not the ones who left b/c of the UK thing.  There are some writers who left eHow before the UK scandal because eHow decided to delete articles that did not fit their new format.  Some of the writers who left were legitimate writers with great articles.  Others were just writing a bunch of low-quality articles that added to the idea that eHow was just a content mill instead of a legitimate source for information.

What happened with eHow and the UK situation was horrible.  I agree that they should have had a system in place to at least compensate writers for the articles on the UK site.  However, I think she may have been talking about the writers who left b/c they did not want to format their articles in a manner which suits eHow.  Yes, the company does have some faults--and I do agree that eHow writers are missing many of those perks--but I&#039;ve also seen forums and sites that are worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glorybug, I think DianeCass is talking about those disgruntled writers who left eHow because they did not follow the rules for writing, not the ones who left b/c of the UK thing.  There are some writers who left eHow before the UK scandal because eHow decided to delete articles that did not fit their new format.  Some of the writers who left were legitimate writers with great articles.  Others were just writing a bunch of low-quality articles that added to the idea that eHow was just a content mill instead of a legitimate source for information.</p>
<p>What happened with eHow and the UK situation was horrible.  I agree that they should have had a system in place to at least compensate writers for the articles on the UK site.  However, I think she may have been talking about the writers who left b/c they did not want to format their articles in a manner which suits eHow.  Yes, the company does have some faults&#8211;and I do agree that eHow writers are missing many of those perks&#8211;but I&#8217;ve also seen forums and sites that are worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nancycarol</title>
		<link>http://kara.allthingsd.com/20100111/demand-media-is-mad-as-hell-and-well-pens-a-manifesto-and-here-it-is/#comment-23976</link>
		<dc:creator>nancycarol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 01:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=22793#comment-23976</guid>
		<description>As an eHow writer, I certainly agree with  Rosenblatt&#039;s point. I have high praise for a company who understands, and provides the everyday needs of everyday people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an eHow writer, I certainly agree with  Rosenblatt&#39;s point. I have high praise for a company who understands, and provides the everyday needs of everyday people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

