According to sources close to the situation, AOL has been busy selecting the board for the company, which is still set to spin itself off by year’s end–even as it slows down a decision on a new search deal with either current partner Google or a more emboldened Microsoft.

AOL is using Spencer Stuart in the search for directors, led by well-known headhunter Jim Citrin, sources said, and the company has already settled on several outside candidates.

The final board is likely to have about 10 members, and up to a dozen.

At least one of those seats will go to CEO Tim Armstrong, with one or two more claimed by its current corporate owner, Time Warner (TWX).

AOL and Time Warner made their own wish list of potential directors earlier this year, but some people are also lobbying the company to join the board.

BoomTown is working on discovering all those names, but sources added that the candidates being looked at are a mix of personalities culled from the media, advertising and Web worlds.

Among the key attributes: More presumably fast-forward and innovative Silicon Valley types that can help burnish AOL’s tarnished tech cred.

Here are some of my picks:

Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg, Guitar Hero CEO Dan Rosensweig, WordPress founder Matt Mullenweg (actually, AOL should buy the start-up), eBay (EBAY) CEO John Donahoe, LinkedIn Chairman Reid Hoffman or CEO Jeff Weiner, Juniper Networks (JNPR) CEO Kevin Johnson, Netflix (NFLX) CEO Reed Hastings, and former AOL iconic exec Ted Leonsis.

And, just for fun, News Corp. (NWS) digital don (and ousted former AOL head) Jon Miller or former Yahoo President Sue Decker.

(I might also add former AOL exec, Netscape co-founder and all-around entrepreneur Marc Andreessen, but if he joins another tech/Web board, he is going to get splinters.)

That’s because Armstrong has set a strategy centered around the turbocharging of online content, powered by a more flexible platform and paid for by goosing AOL’s graphical advertising business.

This puts the online icon–once a powerhouse and now not so much, having operated inside Time Warner since its merger early in this decade–in more serious competition with Yahoo (YHOO).

Yahoo now dominates content on the Web, with powerful news, sports and finance sites, and has recently been trying to reinvigorate its brand. This week, it launched a new marketing campaign with the motto, “It’s Y!ou.”

Yahoo also recently struck a search technology and advertising partnership with Microsoft (MSFT), which has now aimed its efforts at AOL.

According to sources, Microsoft execs have been aggressively courting AOL to switch its search business from Google (GOOG).

The search behemoth has long been AOL’s partner in what sources at both companies said has been a productive and lucrative relationship.

Armstrong is also a former top exec at Google, which many at the company hope will further cement its chances.

And while the renewal of that deal does not officially need to be struck until late next year, sources add that Google has already prepared and offered what it considers an attractive new deal for AOL.

But, much to Google’s chagrin, with a focus on the spinoff and preparations for some more cost-cutting in the months ahead, AOL has decided not to accept it yet and is not likely to anytime soon.

While hedging the situation in a recent video interview with MediaMemo’s Peter Kafka, Armstrong has also recently met with Microsoft execs, sources said, who have discussed a number of partnership options with him, including a tighter relationship with its MSN content properties.

“There’s no need to rush, especially since there is already a lot on AOL’s plate,” said one source close to the situation. “And, since it has options, AOL is going to take time considering them.”

(For more on Armstrong’s thinking, here’s a link to another video interview I did with Armstrong while both of us were in Germany today, in which he talked about the ad market and AOL’s strategy, but was cagey about being more specific.)

Please see this disclosure related to me and Google.

When everyone else has been selling, it seems Carl Icahn has decided to throw good money after bad–as in nearly $1 billion bad–by buying almost seven million more Yahoo shares, according to a regulatory filing.

Why is he doing it? BoomTown is guessing that the billionaire investor thinks he can recoup some of his massive losses in Yahoo, as Jerry Yang prepares to step down, and the board, on which Icahn sits, names a new leader.

That’s why my guess is that the choice of a new CEO is likely to be sooner than later and much more Icahn-friendly.

That could point more clearly to perhaps one of two execs whom Icahn brought with him to the Yahoo (YHOO) board–either former media exec Frank Biondi Jr. or, more likely, former Nextel exec John Chapple.

Another theory is that Yahoo will pick a more low-key, tech-oriented outsider, an operational star who can get things turned around at Yahoo without a lot of fuss, similar to choices made for eBay (EBAY) in its pick of John Donahoe, and Mark Hurd at Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) recently.

One of the names being bandied about in that regard is HP exec Todd Bradley (pictured here).

Bradley is in charge of its massive Personal Systems group, a $28 billion annual business, which includes personal computers, mobile devices, technical workstations, digital televisions, personal storage solutions and Internet services.

Interestingly, another top HP exec, Vyomesh (VJ) Yoshi, who runs its Imaging and Printing group, is currently a director on the Yahoo board.

In any case, the purchase of 6.7 million more Yahoo shares for about $65 million by Icahn over the last several days is definitely a move to watch.

Icahn, who waged a proxy fight against the Internet giant, owns stock that has lost about $900 million in value since he bought about five percent of Yahoo earlier in the year.

That loss comes from his purchase of about 70 million shares in the spring, at about $25 a share, of Yahoo stock, right in the midst of its takeover battle with Microsoft.

Yahoo shares closed Friday at $10.58, up 33 cents.

With the new purchase, Icahn now owns about 5.4 percent of Yahoo, which–combined with three board seats–gives him a lot more clout over decision-making and in forcing the current board to make a CEO pick who will be more interested in doing some sort of deal with Microsoft (MSFT) quickly.

Icahn has long agitated for Yahoo to sell all or part of itself off to the software giant, a move that has been resisted by Yahoo leadership. Instead, Yang tried to pull off a deal with Google (GOOG), which failed.

But that leadership is about to change, as the board searches for a new CEO to replace Yang, who said he was ready to step down a few weeks ago.

Lots of names have been floated for the job–from News Corp. (NWS) COO Peter Chernin to DoubleClick head David Rosenblatt to Google exec Tim Armstrong, as well as former Yahoo COO Dan Rosensweig.

Most sources inside and outside the company do not expect its current president, Sue Decker, who is also up for the job, to be selected.

But many point to a current Yahoo board member as a quick choice, in order to get some key initiatives moving, such as a Microsoft deal or a merger with Time Warner (TWX) online unit, AOL.

That points to someone like Chapple (pictured here), who has been querying a range of midlevel Yahoo execs of late, presumably to get a lay of the land at the company for the board.

He or perhaps even board member Maggie Wilderotter could be picked as an interim CEO, in order to signal to investors that true change is on the way at Yahoo.

Whoever is chosen needs to move quickly said many I spoke to about the Yahoo CEO job.

Wrote one experienced Internet exec in an email to me, reflecting a very common sentiment:

“Whoever comes in is going to have one shot to define the product to the consumer in a way that differentiates it from the rest of the market and provides unique value. Their brand is fuzzy right now. And they’ll have to find a uniqueness in their ad sales so they are not relegated to being the also-ran.”

Well, with all the money riding on it, Carl Icahn certainly has to hope that does not become the case.

Today, Google, the Internet’s juggernaut in both power and profits, will release its third-quarter earnings results after the market closes.

Investors and Silicon Valley will be closely watching Google’s performance and also be listening carefully to the guidance its executives will be giving, hoping the Web’s most stellar performer of late does not stumble.

If it does, some think it is look-out-below time. And, if it does not, it will presumably be all sunshine and daisies for the sector.

Neither is exactly true.

Because, like a lot of healthy and growing companies in the economy, Google (GOOG) can’t help but get dinged by flying debris of the recent financial tornado and its impact on businesses that rely on advertising.

On the other hand, Google’s ad search business is certainly more recession-proof than others, such as the graphical ad offering that Yahoo (YHOO) depends on, which simply means…its ad search business is more recession-proof.

And, given Google’s dominant market share here, this actually means very little to any other digital player.

Still, it will be pins and needles before the third-quarter earnings announcement at 1:30 p.m., Pacific time. The consensus is that Google will have revenues of $4.76 billion for the period and $4.81 in earnings per share.

BoomTown is guessing Google is not likely to disappoint. And, of course, in their ever-quirky way, its leadership troika are certain to make all the right noises about the troubled economy.

Most think they will also outline some sensible cost cuts, which is a good idea, as the peppily profligate search giant has a lot of fat to trim.

That shiatsu-massages-and-lattes-for-all attitude is one of the many reasons (along with international concerns) that worries have mounted about Google’s ability to keep up its blazing past performance and why analysts have slashed forecasts for the company.

That, combined with the Wall Street meltdown, has caused once-soaring shares at Google to plummet, with its stock price cut neatly in half from a year ago.

Google’s stock closed yesterday at $339.17, down $23.54 or 6.5 percent.

“These are turbulent times for which no one has the perfect playbook,” said eBay (EBAY) CEO John Donahoe, after the auction giant predicted in its earnings call that it would be adversely impacted going forward. “There is a high degree of economic uncertainty and turmoil in the business market and that is impacting consumer spending.”

That’s stating the obvious.

Still, the same is true for Google and every other Web company.

Because, even if it’s chin-up for Google tomorrow–no one is going to escape the rocky journey to recovery.

And, if Google chokes a bit? Well, that’s okay too.

In fact, unless you actually think that tech is finished–which would make you not so smart–a hiccup seems entirely appropriate.

Please see this disclosure related to me and Google.

Since BoomTown did an obsessive countdown after Yahoo CEO Jerry Yang last year unwisely promised a 100-day, top-to-bottom look at the company, with “no sacred cows” spared (as it turned out, they all were), I decided that–after the month-mark had passed since Microsoft (MSFT) made its unsolicited bid for Yahoo (YHOO)–it was time for a count-up!

Thus, Day 32 (we’re counting from Friday, Feb. 1, when the offer was made public)!

And, frankly, with the added Leap Day this year to add to Yahoo’s agony, this battle is getting about as exciting as Yang’s 100-day slog–with nothing really page-turning on the horizon since Yahoo’s board kicked Microsoft’s $31-per-share offer to the curb several weeks ago.

Now, of course, Microsoft is returning the favor by loudly prepping a proxy fight and trotting out Silicon Valley companies like TellMe to report that a Microsoft takeover is just hunky-dory.

“We are pretty much doing everything we were doing before–just a lot more of it,” said TellMe head Mike McCue to the Associated Press, with the cheeriness of someone with acute Stockholm syndrome and $800 million in Microsoft money.

And if happy, shiny, Windows-cash-gorged tech people don’t impress, according to several sources close to Microsoft, perhaps a little fear factor will work better.

Said these sources, there will be “three to four big-name CEOs” on its list of new board members that Microsoft must nominate in the next two weeks for its slate of directors to replace Yahoo’s current board.

BoomTown recently reported that the software giant was sniffing around for prospects in Silicon Valley.

But, sorry to say, I still cannot figure out what CEOs these are, despite a lot of effort to find out.

So, I started trying to figure it out myself, focusing on tech and Web execs, who are the obvious choices.

Nonetheless, after going over a long list of possible execs, none of the ones I considered seems likely to turn on Yahoo.

Intel? No, CEO Paul Otellini is on the board of Google.

eBay? No, that’s too big a move for the new CEO John Donahoe.

Sun? No, after Scott McNealy’s funny diatribes against Microsoft for so long, CEO Jonathan Schwartz simply cannot.

Dell? No, CEO and Founder Michael Dell has his hands full.

Amazon? CEO and Founder Jeff Bezos is sassy and lives up near Microsoft, but it would be a real slap at another Web icon like Yang.

WPP Group’s Sir Martin Sorrell? Well, to include an ad biggie would be a good move and Sorrell likes to make pointed remarks about Google, but not that sharp.

Frankly, other than non-tech companies, of which there are probably many choices who owe Microsoft in some way, I am officially out of guesses.

Well, of course, except for one Web 2.0 CEO, who has a big name and is in great–and I mean, great–debt to Microsoft.

In fact, $240 million worth of IOUs. In other words, Facebook CEO and Founder Mark Zuckerberg.

It would be ironic (Yahoo tried to buy Facebook a little more than a year ago), it would be poetic (only in Silicon Valley does the young eat its old) and it would be really fun to watch the fireworks (Facebook is no friend of Google’s).

Most of all, Zuckerberg on the board of Microsoft’s Yahoo would be Steve Ballmer’s ultimate SuperPoke at Yahoo.

Please see this disclosure related to me and Google.